With the current, though hidden, push by the Bush dictator-wannabes to form a North American Union and effectively erase our borders with Canuckistan (Canada) and Tierra de los Mestizos (Mexico), I had more thoughts about the Vinland Nation concept.
In our history, two current states, Vermont and Texas, were once independent entities. Nine states in the South attempted to secede from the Union in 1861, but were put down by the mercantilist dictator, Abraham Lincoln (who was later assassinated for his unConstitutional policies).
There have been other recent secession movements, such as the Free State Project (which decided on New Hampshire as the destination), the Green Mountain Republic (Vermont) group, and various others. None have really had any traction.
As the "Reconquista" project of the Mexican government (aided and abetted by the bandits in Washington at least since the early 1980's) has moved forward, we have gone from a country with a population structure of 89% White, 10% Black and 1% all others in 1950 to 64% non-jewish White, 13% Black, 15% "hispanic", 4% Asian, 3% jewish and remainder all others. This progress is expected to continue, with even Bill Clinton having noted, in a commencement speech, that the U.S. will become majority non-White by 2050.
Coupled with the overall decline of Constitutional civil rights, and the selective enforcement of those remaining (i.e., the Imus case: Whites being prohibited from certain speech open to Blacks, who are protected as a group by the neo-communists currently in power), we face several choices for the future.
The first is to do nothing. Things will progress as they have been. White people will become more marginalized, lose more of their social and political standing, and, in my own opinion and that of many others, eventually be subsumed into the larger, non-White population. This was essentially what happened to the Tokharians of ancient China, the Ainu of Japan, the Aryan Brahmins of India, the Ptolemys of Egypt, and it is happening now among many of the remaining urban Whites of South Africa and Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia). The European homelands are also under assault, but that is a topic for another blog.
The second possibility is voter resistance. However, as has been proven time and again, both major parties in the U.S. are in lockstep on matters of immigration (including protection of illegals), race "relations", integration, affirmative action, etc. This was also the case in the last Congressional election, in which the new Democrat majority lied to the voters, promising an end to Iraq, more transparent government, possible impeachment actions, etc. So voting for change results in nothing. It's all wind designed to keep the masses in check.
A third possible direction is actual citizen paramilitary revolution. This was the Founders' choice, but required large-scale citizen involvement, as well as the remaining neutral citizenry stepping aside and not actively opposing the others. In 1776, this was possible and led the way to successful detachment from King George III's Britain. Now, it is nearly an impossibility. There is no consensus among White Americans as to direction, and none among the other favored groups. No one wants to upset the status quo and potentially lose their Sunday ball games, SUV, and the kids' weekend soccer games. The work of the media in creating a sleepy, consumerist society has been incredibly successful.
As a side note, there are large numbers of non-Whites serving in the military, and chances are they will smiply not be amenable on principle to any White uprising.
China and Japan are holding hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. bonds and other liabilities. The FED continues to pump money into the economy, which debases the currency and causes inflation. The Chinese, not being stupid, are divesting themselves of dollars, and buying real estate, gold, Swiss francs and Euros, as well as having purchased much of our industrial infrastructure for producing durable goods. The latter is also true of India, Korea and Indonesia.
As things begin to tighten economically, and they will as sure as the sun rises, the odds of revolution may increase, although the sheep will probably remain alternately frightened and pacified until it's too late to respond effectively.
Thomas Chittum, in his book "Civil War II: The Coming Breakup of America", coldly assesses our current national predicament and predicts that the U.S. will eventually separate into three predominant states, along racial lines. The southwest, already far along on this road, will become a "hispanic" extension of Mexico. The deep South will become an African-based nation, and the remainder will be White. He also predicts enormous violence and bloodshed during this process. Hopefully, that will not happen, but I am not completely optimistic.
If this comes to pass, the last possibility would be the establishment of a White refuge of sorts, a homeland within the crumbling North American state structures of the U.S. and Canada. Some, including Robert J. Mathews, saw that homeland arising in the Pacific Northwest. However, the numbers of Asians and "hispanics" who are there now preclude that possibility.
Instead, I would create a White national confederated republic with borders encompassing Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, western Massachusetts, northern and western New York, western Pennsylvania and West Virginia. In addition, I would urge the addition of Quebec and the Canadian Maritime provinces of Labrador, Newfoundland, PEI, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick if they've had enough of their increasingly dictatorial overlords. The resulting map would initally look like this:
This would be the core; as time progressed and more areas were decided, more contiguous states and provinces would be added. It's just one scenario among many possibilities.
In order to make this happen, a migration to these areas must begin soon. Land ownership, apart from its intrinsic value, also serves to create voter blocs and eventual local political control. As the Mexicans are doing in the southwest, sheer numbers begin to tip the balance toward de facto political power. This leads to localized decision-making and increasing leverage against the dictates of the Federal power elites.
Is it all just wishful thinking? Perhaps. But I shudder when considering the alternatives.