Monday, June 18, 2007

Turning Out The Lights

(Original posting date 05.29.2007)

This past holiday weekend, my lady friend Carol and I visited the local IKEA store, which is located in the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey. Elizabeth is directly across the Hudson River from the Staten Island section of New York City and is part of the metropolitan area, and this store is always crammed full of shoppers.

In the time I was in the store, there were literally many hundreds of people there. As I often do lately, I head-counted the number of White people in attendance. Apart from the two of us, I counted seven others. Most of the shoppers were Indian, east Asians, "hispanics", and arabics.

This, I have found, is becoming typical of central and northern New Jersey. The media population numbers showing a 2/3 White majority can not possibly be correct. To be sure, there are pocket communities where that's the case, but by and large, I would estimate the White percentage to be closer to 45-50% overall in this state, maybe less. I'd also guess that's probably the case in the neighboring states in the middle Atlantic and southern New England areas.

Although it's been downplayed in, or ignored by, the mainstream media (MSM), so-called "White flight" has been in practice for about 40 years now. White families moved from cities to suburbs to rural areas over time. The reasons given were cloaked: "better schools", "fresh air", "more space", etc. The underlying, unadmitted-to reason was simple: fewer non-Whites around.

This is no longer the case. Apart from the fact that non-Whites historically follow White dispersal patterns in the U.S. and Canada (apparently because Whites create jobs and prosperity conspicuously absent in their own communities), the Federal government has also been at work actively implanting minority populations into the rural heartlands, allegedly to create "diversity" there. This has been followed up by the social engineering of Christian churches, such as the Lutherans of Lewiston, Maine, who thought it a wonderful idea to bring substantial numbers of Somali "refugees" up from majority-Black Atlanta, Georgia into their 98% White area.

In 1965, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, acting as a front man for jewish Senator and tikkun olam activist Emmanuel Celler, succeeded in passing the Immigration and Nationality Act, which removed national origin and entry limits from immigration. Prior to this, immigration was controlled by the Immigration Act of 1924, which was heavily biased in favor of northern Europeans, had precluded Asian immigration and restricted European immigrants to 2% per year of their existing numbers in the U.S.

In the 1960 Census, 88.5% of all Americans were White, 10.5% Black, 0.9% all others. In a public speech in favor of the passage of the 1965 Immigration Act, Kennedy told Congress, apparently with a straight face,

First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia...

In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.

Was Senator Kennedy right, and the concerns simply overblown? Let's see...

The 2000 Census is already out of date and contains the nonsensical and misleading category of "hispanic", covering over 35-million people. If we assume that this group is comprised of 98% non-European Brown, or mestizo people and take them out of the White category, the adjusted numbers were as follows: 62.7% White, 12.3% Black, 3.7% Asian/Pac. Islander, 12.4% "hispanic", and 5.5% "some other race" (whom even the Census Bureau couldn't figure out). Recently, CNN stated that "hispanics" are now 15% of the U.S. population, eclipsing Blacks and others. This too has happened at the expense of Whites.

It's well-known that all great rivers have a tiny point of origin. It's usually a small stream or outlet from a lake high in the mountains. In many cases, one can step or wade across it. In theory, damming that small source would preclude the existence of the entire mighty river downstream.
The people of the United States had an opportunity, 42 years ago, to maintain the status quo by opposing and defeating this Act before it could have been implemented. Since then, we've had ample opportunity to review its effects and either eliminate or correct the faults found. Nothing has been done. Instead, "our" government has lavished praise on the increasing "diversity" provided by the arriving masses of immigrants, whether legal, amnestied or illegal. The media has marched in lockstep with the authorities, also promoting these destructive policies.

The small stream which could have been dammed at the source has become a raging river which threatens to wipe out the entire majority culture. And it's not confined to North America, but has infected, and is destroying, every White nation around the globe.

Whites, as a race, are under enormous pressure to simply accept this flood. There is of course no movement in the opposite direction, no flood of Whites into Africa, China or Mexico. We, however, are encouraged to give up our language, our traditions, our institutions, even our very genes to benefit, give preference to or perpetuate those who are not "us". We are praised as "loving" or "tolerant" when we submerge ourselves and meld into the mass. We are condemned as "hateful" when we express the desire to maintain our racio-ethnic integrity, or when we attempt to live in our own space, or even wish to have our own space.

We have nowhere else to go on this planet. There is nothing we possess, including the land beneath our feet, that isn't coveted by others. When does flight become fight?

David Lane died yesterday, nearly anonymously if relying on the MSM, at age 69. Whatever your opinions of him, or of The Order and its activities, Mr. Lane made a statement which became the articulated creed of White Nationalism: We must secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children.

Is it still possible to do so today? Do we, as a unique and valuable People, have a future?

No comments: