Since the Holocaust Museum attack, the media is referring to the shooter, James von Brunn, as a "hard core Holocaust denier." He surely is, by his own words. But...
There are two questions which need to be asked at this point. First, why is the "denial" of any event which belongs to the early 1940s a taboo? And second, what difference does it make if any single person does or does not believe that the Holocaust happened, or that it was as large an event as we are led to believe? In other words, why must every living person unquestioningly accept what's told, as told? In particular, why every White person?
The problem is, in many places around the world, it is a crime, punishable by imprisonment and heavy fines, to even question the details of the official Holocaust story. Often referred to as "defaming the memory of the dead", it places the jewish Holocaust in the unique position of being the only event in history that even professional historians can't fully examine, or at least can't publish upon, unless their conclusions support the orthodox story. That is intolerable.
So, we have reached an impasse, those of us who believe in completely free political speech when backed by fact, and those who believe in repressing speech and the free exchange of ideas and information. Yet the questions remain and continue to be asked, as the censors seek new ways to disconnect us from the real audience: the people around the world who are, voluntarily or not, giving money and other assistance to the Middle Eastern country whose very "right to exist" completely hinges on the Holocaust's largely oral history. In light of that, I will say that if I can be persuaded of the truth by logical means, I will be first in line to condemn the Germans who perpetrated the crime (but not their children) and first to show solidarity with those who suffered (but not their children, either).
To that end, I have a few requests.
Give us a list of the names, please. All six million. Not the 1919 six million, who didn't actually die anymore than the Kaiser's troops skewered Belgian newborns on bayonets, or made soap from their own war dead. No, the real ones, even the 2.5-million that vanished from the Auschwitz plaque in '89. We'll just assume a rounding error.
Choose the cause of death from among crushing hammers, electrified grids, diesel exhaust, vaporizing guns, steam blasting, or gas chambers. Wait...nevermind; just gas chambers. No, just gas chambers not in Germany. Forget the Nuremberg executions of those camp officers who didn't run the death camps that didn't exist in Germany. They were probably responsible for the Katyn Forest massacre of Polish officers anyhow! Oops, no, those were the Soviets. Good thing they finally owned up to it, even though it took a good while.
Deaths from battlefield crossfire, aerial bombardment, disease and starvation don't count in the totals. Nor do legitimate wartime executions of groups of spies, collaborators or saboteurs. Piles of hair don't indicate homicide, nor do shoes, but they do indicate shaving lice-infected scalps and issuance of uniforms. Even photographs of stacks of bodies, taken in winter when they couldn't be buried, only proves that people, perhaps they were jews, died; not how, when or where.
Show us real, original blueprints for a single killing chamber that was actually used in a prison camp to massively kill humans, not typhus-carrying body lice on inmate bedding. Just one. The Germans, who have a well-earned reputation for precision and efficiency, would surely have created many such examples. Those areas marked "showers" on German diagrams would certainly have had wooden doors, soap trays, shower heads and running water, but probably not gassing ports in the ceiling. Those compartments on the camp plans which are marked gaskammer, or "gas chamber", are usually big enough to fit several dozen blankets, but not dozens of people.
Provide us with cyanide samples from the alleged killing rooms. Cyanide staining lasts for many decades, and is easily traced. You can borrow Fred Leuchter's independently verified wall samples if no one will let you collect your own from the camps.
Provide us with public forensic autopsies done on a random sample of "death camp" fatalities, so that we can see the original "Prussian blue" lung stains of condensed cyanide from gassing. Original, not staged or faked. Original, like Mr. B. Hussein Obama Soetoro's Aloha State COLB "birth certificate" is not.
Look, here's an exercise. Suppose you got news that you lost 10 relatives in a plane crash. But then, years later, you find out that 8 survived. Wouldn't you feel relief, maybe exhilaration, that you hadn't lost as many family members as you'd thought? Sure, two died, but plane crashes are awful things. Just like wars are.
Sometimes things didn't happen like you remember they did. Sometimes your mind fills in the blanks, and the story takes a turn. Sometimes you just hate the enemy so much you'll say anything about him, no matter how untrue or exaggerated. Sometimes you're just tired and hungry and you'll concoct anything to get a meal or a bed.
In the end, as thinking beings with a lust for knowledge, we can't blindly accept that the official Holocaust story can't be questioned in any aspect. We also need to know why those who guard it so zealously, work to come down so hard on those who ask those questions. What brings about that insecurity? We'd like to think stereotypes about those involved are wrong, and it's not really about money or crass political power, or some desire for mind control. That would be a tyranny of the minority. We all know in our bones that Political Correctness has been wrong in a Constitutional Republic from Day One, so that's not what you're pushing, right?
Until every White person who calls this planet home is no longer denied their Right to ask about this one forbidden thing without threats and reprisals by their various regimes and their media sycophants, while the 1st and 2nd Amendments still have teeth, we in America must do it for them.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Monday, January 19, 2009
Other Options
During a lull in my work activity, I spent some time listening to a YouTube video by a fellow representing a "survival" site, which shall remain nameless. The guy rambled on a bit about his site, and then launched into an impromptu disclaimer. The statement, which I have heard many times on many sites in many forms was, essentially, "this information is presented for entertainment purposes and under no circumstances are we advocating violence", etc. etc.
I stopped the video, because my mind generated a divide-by-zero error.
Any site which claims to be for "survivalists" can not, under any circumstances, be opposed to prudent self-defense. To defend oneself, one can be stealthy and avoid confrontation, it's true. But, in the end, self-defense will almost certainly include the use of violence against one or more opponents. Going one step back in time, this requires both equipment and training for one to successfully remain alive and functional.
A true national emergency can happen due to any one of several circumstances: economic collapse, epidemic, large-scale power outages, external attack, wide-ranging internal terrorist acts, and so on. In such instances, while police lockdown or martial law may be imposed, there is no possible way for government to stem the actions of millions of people at once. As with all attempts at enforcing law, the "authorities" are much better at collecting evidence or rounding up offenders after the fact. This won't save anyone in the interim.
Most self-defense situations during national emergencies will NOT be one-on-one. They will involve groups of varying sizes, from a handful to a small army, preying upon individuals or families and having their way with the hapless victims and their property. Many of those instances will involve gangs or other organized criminals. Most of the victims will not be similarly organized, mainly due to the fact that law enforcement goes after the easy targets (a group of 25 White males conducting drills in the woods with Airsoft guns, deemed a "militia", and oppressed by the cops) instead of the actual severe threats to public order (i.e., the 60,000-strong, Black Gangster Disciples or the 50,000-strong, "hispanic" MS-13 operate pretty freely). Keeping our borders wide open for the easy entry of threats has helped the criminals immensely.
Couple this with the fact that, in many Leftist-controlled jurisdictions, responding with firearms even in defense of one's own life or the life of one's family is a felony. Of course, the criminals, who routinely maim or kill people and are often given little punishment for doing so, don't seem to abide by such trivial laws as those restricting gun ownership.
So, I propose something a bit different, without disclaimers and fretting. You may call me an alarmist, a fool or "Chicken Little". No matter.
I encourage every American citizen, and in particular every White American, to arm himself in any way he possibly can. I also encourage practicing in the use of every kind of firearm, from handguns to rifles to shotguns to bazookas, if you have them. One of the government's big pushes will be to attempt to confiscate all firearms. Never forget the old proverb, "A man with a gun is a citizen; a man without a gun is a subject".
I believe the training you undertake should also include basic anti-personnel devices, long-range shooting, use of edged weapons, basic chemical weaponry, and explosives theory. It should stress teamwork, setting up fields of fire, ambush, lateral assault, and squad tactics. Advance warning indicators, such as perimeter tripwires, motion-detection devices, or even the family dog, should be used to best advantage.
It's also a great idea, in my opinion, to learn everything about your neighborhood from a logistical and tactical point of view, and, if possible, to train with your neighbors to develop an encompassing protection plan for all the families in that neighborhood. Include mapping of your area, vantage points, clear areas, shelters, alternate access routes, etc.
When the bottom falls out and things go haywire, they will deteriorate with blinding speed and your world will change in days. We are in a time of relative peace and quiet now, which cannot and will not last.
As I write this, the Federal Zionist Occupation Government is working overtime to keep the lid on the economy and prevent its collapse under the burden of $10-Trillion of debt it can't support. Money is being printed like so much newsprint, and its value is dropping. The Kenyan Pretender is about to take his chieftain's throne, and has made many promises which neither he nor his handlers can possibly keep while maintaining a viable economy. And from everything I've seen of him, Obama and his crew are nothing if not anti-White in their focus.
So, use the time we have to put together your plan of action. Get away from urban areas, from which most of the violence will emanate. If you are staying put, work to reinforce your position, get to know who among your neighbors you can trust in and rely upon, and get your gear in place. Set up fall-back locations and escape routes. If at all possible, avoid having to go to FEMA, police or military "refugee" (detention) centers. Dissolve into the background and avoid all contact with "authorities" whose primary purpose is to dispossess you of your liberties and place you under their absolute control.
If you are planning a bug-out to a new location, get that place set up now if you haven't already. Otherwise, do not expect that you will be treated any differently than the millions of others who will be reacting by flailing about helplessly after the fact.
I stopped the video, because my mind generated a divide-by-zero error.
Any site which claims to be for "survivalists" can not, under any circumstances, be opposed to prudent self-defense. To defend oneself, one can be stealthy and avoid confrontation, it's true. But, in the end, self-defense will almost certainly include the use of violence against one or more opponents. Going one step back in time, this requires both equipment and training for one to successfully remain alive and functional.
A true national emergency can happen due to any one of several circumstances: economic collapse, epidemic, large-scale power outages, external attack, wide-ranging internal terrorist acts, and so on. In such instances, while police lockdown or martial law may be imposed, there is no possible way for government to stem the actions of millions of people at once. As with all attempts at enforcing law, the "authorities" are much better at collecting evidence or rounding up offenders after the fact. This won't save anyone in the interim.
Most self-defense situations during national emergencies will NOT be one-on-one. They will involve groups of varying sizes, from a handful to a small army, preying upon individuals or families and having their way with the hapless victims and their property. Many of those instances will involve gangs or other organized criminals. Most of the victims will not be similarly organized, mainly due to the fact that law enforcement goes after the easy targets (a group of 25 White males conducting drills in the woods with Airsoft guns, deemed a "militia", and oppressed by the cops) instead of the actual severe threats to public order (i.e., the 60,000-strong, Black Gangster Disciples or the 50,000-strong, "hispanic" MS-13 operate pretty freely). Keeping our borders wide open for the easy entry of threats has helped the criminals immensely.
Couple this with the fact that, in many Leftist-controlled jurisdictions, responding with firearms even in defense of one's own life or the life of one's family is a felony. Of course, the criminals, who routinely maim or kill people and are often given little punishment for doing so, don't seem to abide by such trivial laws as those restricting gun ownership.
So, I propose something a bit different, without disclaimers and fretting. You may call me an alarmist, a fool or "Chicken Little". No matter.
I encourage every American citizen, and in particular every White American, to arm himself in any way he possibly can. I also encourage practicing in the use of every kind of firearm, from handguns to rifles to shotguns to bazookas, if you have them. One of the government's big pushes will be to attempt to confiscate all firearms. Never forget the old proverb, "A man with a gun is a citizen; a man without a gun is a subject".
I believe the training you undertake should also include basic anti-personnel devices, long-range shooting, use of edged weapons, basic chemical weaponry, and explosives theory. It should stress teamwork, setting up fields of fire, ambush, lateral assault, and squad tactics. Advance warning indicators, such as perimeter tripwires, motion-detection devices, or even the family dog, should be used to best advantage.
It's also a great idea, in my opinion, to learn everything about your neighborhood from a logistical and tactical point of view, and, if possible, to train with your neighbors to develop an encompassing protection plan for all the families in that neighborhood. Include mapping of your area, vantage points, clear areas, shelters, alternate access routes, etc.
When the bottom falls out and things go haywire, they will deteriorate with blinding speed and your world will change in days. We are in a time of relative peace and quiet now, which cannot and will not last.
As I write this, the Federal Zionist Occupation Government is working overtime to keep the lid on the economy and prevent its collapse under the burden of $10-Trillion of debt it can't support. Money is being printed like so much newsprint, and its value is dropping. The Kenyan Pretender is about to take his chieftain's throne, and has made many promises which neither he nor his handlers can possibly keep while maintaining a viable economy. And from everything I've seen of him, Obama and his crew are nothing if not anti-White in their focus.
So, use the time we have to put together your plan of action. Get away from urban areas, from which most of the violence will emanate. If you are staying put, work to reinforce your position, get to know who among your neighbors you can trust in and rely upon, and get your gear in place. Set up fall-back locations and escape routes. If at all possible, avoid having to go to FEMA, police or military "refugee" (detention) centers. Dissolve into the background and avoid all contact with "authorities" whose primary purpose is to dispossess you of your liberties and place you under their absolute control.
If you are planning a bug-out to a new location, get that place set up now if you haven't already. Otherwise, do not expect that you will be treated any differently than the millions of others who will be reacting by flailing about helplessly after the fact.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Pulling Rabbits Out Of Hats
In the realm of magic, as Penn Jillette has pointed out, the key elements in getting an audience to believe are willingness to be tricked, and misdirection. When a rabbit is pulled out of a hat, or a baton changed into a dove, no one really believes that such physical transformations happen. Yet, because of the magician's skill and deftness, even when we watch the illusion up-close and step by step, we often have no idea how he fools us.
Tonight, the whoring magicians in the U.S. Senate will very likely overrule the wishes of their nominal constituents, the American taxpayers, and pass a bill handing over the [initial] amount of $700,000,000,000.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury, Hank Paulson. Paulson will, according to the plan, use that money to "free business credit" and "absorb toxic debts" of the major investment banks remaining, and of other institutions. We have been told ad nauseum by the government-scripted, controlled media that it must be passed "for Wall Street or terrible things will happen on Main Street". Seven-hundred-thousand-million dollars, mortgaged against the future earnings of working Americans to pay off bad investments.
Several years ago, I made a choice to put money into a property when I should have walked away. A series of disastrous happenings landed me in front of a municipal court, facing environmental violations which had been accruing for seven months at the rate of $310 per DAY, seven days a week. These fines emanated from an agreement to abate a problem which the contractor reneged on. Three days from the court date, I found a buyer who could handle the abatement and unloaded the property to him. The court agreed to drop the accrued fines which totaled almost $70,000. However, I still lost almost $20,000 over that time. Yet, no one offered to pay off my debt, and no Senator pleaded my case. My bad business decision was mine alone, as it should be.
In the 1980's, a group of banking-type institutions, the Savings & Loans, which had been a backbone of American community finance for almost 100 years, began to get into trouble. As deregulation proceeded, the S&L's, in order to compete with banks, began to extend mortgages to riskier buyers. In the mid-80's, the mortgage market softened, and a chain reaction of failure spread. The American taxpayers were socked with a bill for over $125-billion, and it did not stop the crash. The FSLIC, which was the FDIC for Savings & Loans, was destroyed. In the end, the industry was swallowed by the banks.
During Bill Clinton's presidency, an effort began to get "every person into an affordable house", a ridiculously naive idea by the ridiculously naive Left. The problem was, low-income and no-income people weren't in houses for a good reason: they couldn't handle debt, couldn't hold jobs that paid decent wages, and were almost entirely financially unreliable. There was, in the minds of the social engineers, a solution for this: the Subprime Mortgage, which began to be used in re-urbanization projects in 1994 and gained more traction over time.
Subprime mortgages are those with initial rates below the prime rate banks themselves pay for borrowed money, financed for subprime borrowers, those who would not normally qualify for a home mortgage. The hook is, the buyer can now afford a home, or a home which he couldn't afford under normal circumstances (either in terms of size or neighborhood), and was seen as a way to break minority families into predominantly-White neighborhoods. And for 1 to 3 years, normally, the rate of payment stays nice and low.
There were two assumptions built into these loans. The first was, the buyer would most likely be doing better financially after the pre-adjustment period, and so would be better able to afford a higher payment. The second, which was the backbone of the plan, was that the price of housing, and therefore the equity in one's house, would continue to climb over time. If that happened, a new fixed-rate mortgage could often take over the adjustable-rate note and everything would be normalized.
There was a push by the Clinton Administration to hand out these loans, but the banks were understandably reluctant to do so, having the S&L debacle fresh in their greedy minds. But the government gave them assurances and authorized private mortgage insurance carriers (such as AIG) to handle coverage for the banks, and other government-backed entities (FNMA/"Fannie Mae" and FHLMC/"Freddie Mac") to carry loans directly. The Federal Reserve also agreed to push out funds if banks needed short- to mid-term carrying capital. However, things didn't heat up until 1999, when Clinton made the housing issue a priority and began to pressure banks, taking a page from the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and its favoritism toward low-income minority borrowers.
The banks worked hard to lend as much money as possible under the subprime scheme, and began to open more capital for the program. As this happened, demand for homes began to rise. Housing, which had previously been seen as a fixed asset, began to be viewed as a commodity. Housing began to be played like stocks, and the price began to rise, geometrically in many markets. People also began to borrow against their newfound equity, using their homes as ATMs, which in turn devalued them overall. This added to the boom of the late 90's and into the 21st Century, but took down ownership interest which had built up over years.
By the time of 9/11, the market was so pricey in many locations that buyers were beginning to decrease. However, people continued to believe in the growth factor, so the market remained strong. By 2002-03, most observant economists saw the coming end of the bubble. The market was largely tapped out in terms of growth, and the traditional buyers were thinning. So again, the push was on to get "asses in the seats", to get existing homes sold, and to keep the new construction market pumped. The only way to do that was a massive push to get those otherwise-unqualified buyers in, in record numbers. The insinuation to get these loans made was that, because the vast majority of subprime borrowers were Black and "hispanic", anyone who opposed the idea was "racist".
Meanwhile, the same banks also knew that these loans, which were dependent on escalating housing prices, were doomed to fail. For instance, Goldman Sachs, one of the largest investment banks and former domain of Treasury Secretary Paulson, was playing both sides of the coin. They were modestly selling subprimes while at the same time buying puts (rights to sell stock) in their competitors operations, including Lehman Brothers. They knew enough to know that they needed to hedge their bets and save their tails when the bottom fell out. And they knew it would fall out.
The entire subprime framework was a Ponzi scheme from the beginning, dependent upon impossibly constant gains in housing prices to sustain itself. It was driven to failure with the addition of millions of home buyers who should (and would) never have been given a second look for the money without the Federal guarantees in place.
As the dominos began to fall, as the banks which had (as with the S&L's) extended themselves for the quick dollar began to head for the toilet, so too did the pressure begin to build on the companies which insured those assets, including AIG. The insurors turned to the Federal government and demanded, as per their agreement, that Washington bail them out. In AIG's case, the President, who is disallowed from doing such things by the Constitution which he so disdains, bought ownership rights in the name of the American taxpayers against future gains. The price tag: $85-billion. The Bush people also gave incentives to companies that bailed out some of the failing institutions, such as Wachovia.
The problem was, and is, that there are many other "bets" on the performance of the subprime lending scam, called "derivatives". This is an unregulated market, run by small firms which spread the paper out far and wide. A total of perhaps $55-TRILLION is out there, relying on the continuation of the game. The people who've played these bets are often the same ones who run retirement and pension funds and other "straight" investment operations. The people who run the government know this and are beholden to these money people. The entire U.S. budget for 2008 is about $2.9-Trillion for comparison, so the estimated mortgage-related derivatives equal about 19 times the annual expenditures of the entire country. And the sum of all derivatives markets may involve an inconceivable $1.4-QUADRILLION.
Unfortunately, despite the threats of Wall Street to throw a hissy-fit and crash the market, this bailout is only a temporary respite even if passed in its entirety. To prove this, you may note that the FED just released $630-Billion into the banking economy to keep things afloat (on top of $180-billion last week). That money further erodes the value of the American dollar. China is getting anxious, so is Japan, and both are beginning to attach strings to the billions we borrow from them, most of which is paying for the Iraq conflict our kids are dying in for Israel's benefit, at $15-billion per month.
The foundation of the bailout plan rests on rotten timbers. The housing market bubble, like tech stocks, has passed and won't be back anytime soon. Mortgages in amounts far greater than the market value of the houses they cover are piling up. Borrowers are walking off, new buyers aren't there. We are throwing $700-BILLION into a rat-hole. It will be followed by more demands for more payments we can't make. The stock market will have, perhaps, one last hurrah to allow the swindlers to retrieve what's left of their money. Washington will probably open up bulk gold sales to allow the same bastards to convert their funds and head out of the country.
We are standing on the precipice of the worst economic storm to ever hit the United States, one which will dwarf the Great Depression, one which may completely tear the country apart. The Army has decided to station an Army division within the U.S. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is busy constucting detention centers across the country. Mexico's leadership has stated that they will defend their borders if we try to repatriate illegals. Our European allies, what's left of them, have no sympathy for us. What's coming is almost unimaginably bad. And ALL of the candidates for the White House are in lockstep for the destruction of our country.
The time for preparation is almost over. As a good Christian friend of mine used to say, "The time's coming to get a patch, get a gun, and get right with God". I couldn't agree more. Get together with your friends and family, get as far away from the cities as you can, get supplied, and may the Holy Ones look kindly upon you.
Tonight, the whoring magicians in the U.S. Senate will very likely overrule the wishes of their nominal constituents, the American taxpayers, and pass a bill handing over the [initial] amount of $700,000,000,000.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury, Hank Paulson. Paulson will, according to the plan, use that money to "free business credit" and "absorb toxic debts" of the major investment banks remaining, and of other institutions. We have been told ad nauseum by the government-scripted, controlled media that it must be passed "for Wall Street or terrible things will happen on Main Street". Seven-hundred-thousand-million dollars, mortgaged against the future earnings of working Americans to pay off bad investments.
Several years ago, I made a choice to put money into a property when I should have walked away. A series of disastrous happenings landed me in front of a municipal court, facing environmental violations which had been accruing for seven months at the rate of $310 per DAY, seven days a week. These fines emanated from an agreement to abate a problem which the contractor reneged on. Three days from the court date, I found a buyer who could handle the abatement and unloaded the property to him. The court agreed to drop the accrued fines which totaled almost $70,000. However, I still lost almost $20,000 over that time. Yet, no one offered to pay off my debt, and no Senator pleaded my case. My bad business decision was mine alone, as it should be.
In the 1980's, a group of banking-type institutions, the Savings & Loans, which had been a backbone of American community finance for almost 100 years, began to get into trouble. As deregulation proceeded, the S&L's, in order to compete with banks, began to extend mortgages to riskier buyers. In the mid-80's, the mortgage market softened, and a chain reaction of failure spread. The American taxpayers were socked with a bill for over $125-billion, and it did not stop the crash. The FSLIC, which was the FDIC for Savings & Loans, was destroyed. In the end, the industry was swallowed by the banks.
During Bill Clinton's presidency, an effort began to get "every person into an affordable house", a ridiculously naive idea by the ridiculously naive Left. The problem was, low-income and no-income people weren't in houses for a good reason: they couldn't handle debt, couldn't hold jobs that paid decent wages, and were almost entirely financially unreliable. There was, in the minds of the social engineers, a solution for this: the Subprime Mortgage, which began to be used in re-urbanization projects in 1994 and gained more traction over time.
Subprime mortgages are those with initial rates below the prime rate banks themselves pay for borrowed money, financed for subprime borrowers, those who would not normally qualify for a home mortgage. The hook is, the buyer can now afford a home, or a home which he couldn't afford under normal circumstances (either in terms of size or neighborhood), and was seen as a way to break minority families into predominantly-White neighborhoods. And for 1 to 3 years, normally, the rate of payment stays nice and low.
There were two assumptions built into these loans. The first was, the buyer would most likely be doing better financially after the pre-adjustment period, and so would be better able to afford a higher payment. The second, which was the backbone of the plan, was that the price of housing, and therefore the equity in one's house, would continue to climb over time. If that happened, a new fixed-rate mortgage could often take over the adjustable-rate note and everything would be normalized.
There was a push by the Clinton Administration to hand out these loans, but the banks were understandably reluctant to do so, having the S&L debacle fresh in their greedy minds. But the government gave them assurances and authorized private mortgage insurance carriers (such as AIG) to handle coverage for the banks, and other government-backed entities (FNMA/"Fannie Mae" and FHLMC/"Freddie Mac") to carry loans directly. The Federal Reserve also agreed to push out funds if banks needed short- to mid-term carrying capital. However, things didn't heat up until 1999, when Clinton made the housing issue a priority and began to pressure banks, taking a page from the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and its favoritism toward low-income minority borrowers.
The banks worked hard to lend as much money as possible under the subprime scheme, and began to open more capital for the program. As this happened, demand for homes began to rise. Housing, which had previously been seen as a fixed asset, began to be viewed as a commodity. Housing began to be played like stocks, and the price began to rise, geometrically in many markets. People also began to borrow against their newfound equity, using their homes as ATMs, which in turn devalued them overall. This added to the boom of the late 90's and into the 21st Century, but took down ownership interest which had built up over years.
By the time of 9/11, the market was so pricey in many locations that buyers were beginning to decrease. However, people continued to believe in the growth factor, so the market remained strong. By 2002-03, most observant economists saw the coming end of the bubble. The market was largely tapped out in terms of growth, and the traditional buyers were thinning. So again, the push was on to get "asses in the seats", to get existing homes sold, and to keep the new construction market pumped. The only way to do that was a massive push to get those otherwise-unqualified buyers in, in record numbers. The insinuation to get these loans made was that, because the vast majority of subprime borrowers were Black and "hispanic", anyone who opposed the idea was "racist".
Meanwhile, the same banks also knew that these loans, which were dependent on escalating housing prices, were doomed to fail. For instance, Goldman Sachs, one of the largest investment banks and former domain of Treasury Secretary Paulson, was playing both sides of the coin. They were modestly selling subprimes while at the same time buying puts (rights to sell stock) in their competitors operations, including Lehman Brothers. They knew enough to know that they needed to hedge their bets and save their tails when the bottom fell out. And they knew it would fall out.
The entire subprime framework was a Ponzi scheme from the beginning, dependent upon impossibly constant gains in housing prices to sustain itself. It was driven to failure with the addition of millions of home buyers who should (and would) never have been given a second look for the money without the Federal guarantees in place.
As the dominos began to fall, as the banks which had (as with the S&L's) extended themselves for the quick dollar began to head for the toilet, so too did the pressure begin to build on the companies which insured those assets, including AIG. The insurors turned to the Federal government and demanded, as per their agreement, that Washington bail them out. In AIG's case, the President, who is disallowed from doing such things by the Constitution which he so disdains, bought ownership rights in the name of the American taxpayers against future gains. The price tag: $85-billion. The Bush people also gave incentives to companies that bailed out some of the failing institutions, such as Wachovia.
The problem was, and is, that there are many other "bets" on the performance of the subprime lending scam, called "derivatives". This is an unregulated market, run by small firms which spread the paper out far and wide. A total of perhaps $55-TRILLION is out there, relying on the continuation of the game. The people who've played these bets are often the same ones who run retirement and pension funds and other "straight" investment operations. The people who run the government know this and are beholden to these money people. The entire U.S. budget for 2008 is about $2.9-Trillion for comparison, so the estimated mortgage-related derivatives equal about 19 times the annual expenditures of the entire country. And the sum of all derivatives markets may involve an inconceivable $1.4-QUADRILLION.
Unfortunately, despite the threats of Wall Street to throw a hissy-fit and crash the market, this bailout is only a temporary respite even if passed in its entirety. To prove this, you may note that the FED just released $630-Billion into the banking economy to keep things afloat (on top of $180-billion last week). That money further erodes the value of the American dollar. China is getting anxious, so is Japan, and both are beginning to attach strings to the billions we borrow from them, most of which is paying for the Iraq conflict our kids are dying in for Israel's benefit, at $15-billion per month.
The foundation of the bailout plan rests on rotten timbers. The housing market bubble, like tech stocks, has passed and won't be back anytime soon. Mortgages in amounts far greater than the market value of the houses they cover are piling up. Borrowers are walking off, new buyers aren't there. We are throwing $700-BILLION into a rat-hole. It will be followed by more demands for more payments we can't make. The stock market will have, perhaps, one last hurrah to allow the swindlers to retrieve what's left of their money. Washington will probably open up bulk gold sales to allow the same bastards to convert their funds and head out of the country.
We are standing on the precipice of the worst economic storm to ever hit the United States, one which will dwarf the Great Depression, one which may completely tear the country apart. The Army has decided to station an Army division within the U.S. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is busy constucting detention centers across the country. Mexico's leadership has stated that they will defend their borders if we try to repatriate illegals. Our European allies, what's left of them, have no sympathy for us. What's coming is almost unimaginably bad. And ALL of the candidates for the White House are in lockstep for the destruction of our country.
The time for preparation is almost over. As a good Christian friend of mine used to say, "The time's coming to get a patch, get a gun, and get right with God". I couldn't agree more. Get together with your friends and family, get as far away from the cities as you can, get supplied, and may the Holy Ones look kindly upon you.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
We Feed, They Breed, Etc.
One thing I've noticed in conversations over the past several weeks has been a growing general sense of unease in people. Some of it is an adverse reaction of White people to the idea of an Obama presidency, but many Whites look at McCain with equal disdain and mistrust. Bush's tyrannical, Executive Order-saturated tenure is, mercifully, coming to a close. The most power-drunk, smug, sanctimonious, condescending, sarcastic and anti-Constitutional adult child ever to hold the highest office in the U.S. is finally heading off into the sunset, and if we ever hear from him again, it'll be too soon.
The American people are facing a coming together of many currents, and each day a different one becomes the priority. The housing market collapse, the fluctuating price of fuel, dizzying gold and silver peaks and valleys, the continuing decline of the dollar, job losses, increasing imbalance of trade, the tensions over Iran, and Georgia's attack of South Ossetia followed by Russia's military response are the headline grabbers that keep people wondering.
But all of these things share a commonality: they are essentially externals. Between 1787 and 1965, the U.S. saw its share of good and bad times, scandals, booms, busts, expansions, wars, and change. But we got through those times, including the worst economic depression ever seen, and came out whole. The main reason had nothing to do with what we had or how we earned a living or the price of a cup of coffee. The "how", the "why" and the "where" were meaningless. It was entirely about the "who". During all those trials, we were a land where 9 out of 10 of us were White people.
Yesterday, I read a new projection, crowed about by the Leftists in the media who want the White race destroyed. It claimed that Whites will no longer be a numerical majority in the U.S. by the year 2042, eight years earlier than previously predicted. It also stated that school-aged White kids are already under the 50% mark, with "hispanics" being the fastest-growing non-White group. Of course, this doesn't mean that Whites will be a minority then, only that we will be a plurality, the largest group among many. However, minority status will not be far behind.
This got me thinking about another tidbit of information I'd seen a few months ago. A demographer did some calculations, taking into account the high birthrate among Mexicans and other "hispanics" living within the United States, and using a figure of 20-million illegal criminal aliens among them. His conclusion was that, even if we closed the border, tight as a drum, at this very moment, "hispanics" would still be a majority by 2050 or so. It would only avoid the 2042 transition for a few extra years. But in fact, the border remains open and pregnant Mexican women come into the U.S. to have their "anchor babies" here and drag their entire family's future into America's.
What effects will a non-White majority have on this land, on our People and our children? It will not be positive, of that I am absolutely certain. Although we are not "allowed", as a Race, to display pride in public, and condemned as "haters" for attempting to do so, other Races hold us responsible for what happened to their people 50, 100 or 300 years ago. We get the blame without any reward. It's a lose/lose situation for European-Americans.
The major "hispanic" movement, "The Council of La Raza" (The Race), is anti-White and anti-American. Its primary goal is the "return" of lands allegedly stolen from Mexicans, and the completion of "Reconquista" (re-conquest). Anyone who thinks that these folks will be level-headed and kind, if they succeed in their plan, is nuts. And several institutions, like Wachovia Bank, have made major contributions to this openly racist group. On the heels of this, we are also being rapidly besieged by such lovely people as the ultra-violent, racist MS-13 gang, which originated in El Salvador*.
So, "hispanics" will be the predominant contenders for power. In spite of their claims, most of the Southwest was held by local, native tribes, not Mexican Indians like the Chihuahuas. They have no "entitlement" to it. And without question, they have exactly ZERO right or claim in any of the Southern, Northwestern, Midwestern or Eastern states.Yet they continue to swarm into those places, lured in by mostly upper-class Whites, people whose avoidance of hard work and emphasis on easy living is now legendary. As with the introduction of slavery into the Colonies, fault for the influx of Mexican CrimMigrants lies in the greed of these White Americans.
Blacks also want us to lose our majority status. In the meantime, they, through their media whores and minstrels like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson (you know, the "reverend" who called Obama a nigger and threatened to cut off his balls, to no outcry from the "Black community"?) want more and more from White Americans every year. In the early 1950s, a jewish-created organization called the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) used its political connections to force school integration on White Americans. This was needed because "discrimination" prevented Black kids from succeeding. The missing factor was, and remains, that American Blacks test out, on average, in the 85 IQ range, to the White kids 100. This isn't racist propaganda, it's hard science. As I've admitted, White men can't jump, but Black men can't do linear algebra.
However, White America suspended its collective disbelief and integration spread from schools to neighborhoods to churches to politics. During that time, White people came up with what I call "guilt programs": welfare and later AFDC, food stamps, HeadStart, Affirmative Action, racial quotas in hiring and education, reduced fees and college tuition for minorities, free or reduced-cost healthcare...you name it, White people have offered these gifts to Blacks, because we "treated them so awfully in the past". Well of course, slavery is a horrible policy. But after it was over, the children of those slaves had the highest standard of living among non-Whites anywhere in the world.
After all that, White people are now expected to get in line for reparations payments for "our" part in slavery. The fact that not a single living person in the U.S. was ever directly affected by or participated in slavery on either side is no deterrent.
In the end, we are the butt of every negative attitude possible among non-Whites. We are despised by them, hated, targeted. The rhetoric of Obama's Black supporters echoes this. In spite of this, the direction of immigration is always a flow of non-Whites into White countries. If we're so awful, so "racist", why do they want to be among us?
But, what will happen when we're no longer "in charge", when our lands are no longer ours, when we are not leaders but subjects? How might things change?
Let's see...Whites have invented pretty much every object, device and system that makes modern life livable. This runs from conveniences like television, telephones, electric lighting, automobiles, aircraft, internal combustion engines, electronics, and computers, to life-sustaining systems that allow six-billion humans to inhabit this planet: mass agriculture (including chemical pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides as well as plant hybridization and improved seed storage), modern medicine including epidemiology, recycling and reduction of waste products and pollutants, and energy-efficient construction and operational techniques. These contributions have allowed most of the 3rd World to survive childhood and have large families. In fact, it has allowed the world's population balance to shift from 34% White in 1900 to between just 8-10% today. We can't know for sure, because many countries don't want to alarm their White residents by posting correct census figures. But we can say with certainty, for instance, that there are more Indians or Chinese or Africans on Earth than all White people combined. We are only a majority in a few places, for now.
And when large non-White families arrive in this land, courtesy of Emmanuel Celler's and Ted Kennedy's 1965 inversion of the immigrant ratios, we generally pay for them in one way or another. That money will be gone.
White Folk need to make hard decisions, and soon. We need to turn a critical eye on our apparent willingness to contribute to our own extinction. Will we expend our talents, our creativity, our work and our time to help others or ourselves? Will we continue to give away our technologies to those who can't properly use them or keep them for our own enrichment and progress? Will we continue to live among people who hate us, or form our own lands and let them fend for themselves without us? These and other choices will be made, either by us or for us.
It's time we worked together to ensure our own future. It's time for us to put ourselves first and let the chips fall where they will. It's time for us to part company with the leeches who are draining our resources, filling our spaces and abusing our Folk. It's time for the restoration of White Nations.
(* Note: many thanks to Mad Casper for his editing!)
The American people are facing a coming together of many currents, and each day a different one becomes the priority. The housing market collapse, the fluctuating price of fuel, dizzying gold and silver peaks and valleys, the continuing decline of the dollar, job losses, increasing imbalance of trade, the tensions over Iran, and Georgia's attack of South Ossetia followed by Russia's military response are the headline grabbers that keep people wondering.
But all of these things share a commonality: they are essentially externals. Between 1787 and 1965, the U.S. saw its share of good and bad times, scandals, booms, busts, expansions, wars, and change. But we got through those times, including the worst economic depression ever seen, and came out whole. The main reason had nothing to do with what we had or how we earned a living or the price of a cup of coffee. The "how", the "why" and the "where" were meaningless. It was entirely about the "who". During all those trials, we were a land where 9 out of 10 of us were White people.
Yesterday, I read a new projection, crowed about by the Leftists in the media who want the White race destroyed. It claimed that Whites will no longer be a numerical majority in the U.S. by the year 2042, eight years earlier than previously predicted. It also stated that school-aged White kids are already under the 50% mark, with "hispanics" being the fastest-growing non-White group. Of course, this doesn't mean that Whites will be a minority then, only that we will be a plurality, the largest group among many. However, minority status will not be far behind.
This got me thinking about another tidbit of information I'd seen a few months ago. A demographer did some calculations, taking into account the high birthrate among Mexicans and other "hispanics" living within the United States, and using a figure of 20-million illegal criminal aliens among them. His conclusion was that, even if we closed the border, tight as a drum, at this very moment, "hispanics" would still be a majority by 2050 or so. It would only avoid the 2042 transition for a few extra years. But in fact, the border remains open and pregnant Mexican women come into the U.S. to have their "anchor babies" here and drag their entire family's future into America's.
What effects will a non-White majority have on this land, on our People and our children? It will not be positive, of that I am absolutely certain. Although we are not "allowed", as a Race, to display pride in public, and condemned as "haters" for attempting to do so, other Races hold us responsible for what happened to their people 50, 100 or 300 years ago. We get the blame without any reward. It's a lose/lose situation for European-Americans.
The major "hispanic" movement, "The Council of La Raza" (The Race), is anti-White and anti-American. Its primary goal is the "return" of lands allegedly stolen from Mexicans, and the completion of "Reconquista" (re-conquest). Anyone who thinks that these folks will be level-headed and kind, if they succeed in their plan, is nuts. And several institutions, like Wachovia Bank, have made major contributions to this openly racist group. On the heels of this, we are also being rapidly besieged by such lovely people as the ultra-violent, racist MS-13 gang, which originated in El Salvador*.
So, "hispanics" will be the predominant contenders for power. In spite of their claims, most of the Southwest was held by local, native tribes, not Mexican Indians like the Chihuahuas. They have no "entitlement" to it. And without question, they have exactly ZERO right or claim in any of the Southern, Northwestern, Midwestern or Eastern states.Yet they continue to swarm into those places, lured in by mostly upper-class Whites, people whose avoidance of hard work and emphasis on easy living is now legendary. As with the introduction of slavery into the Colonies, fault for the influx of Mexican CrimMigrants lies in the greed of these White Americans.
Blacks also want us to lose our majority status. In the meantime, they, through their media whores and minstrels like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson (you know, the "reverend" who called Obama a nigger and threatened to cut off his balls, to no outcry from the "Black community"?) want more and more from White Americans every year. In the early 1950s, a jewish-created organization called the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) used its political connections to force school integration on White Americans. This was needed because "discrimination" prevented Black kids from succeeding. The missing factor was, and remains, that American Blacks test out, on average, in the 85 IQ range, to the White kids 100. This isn't racist propaganda, it's hard science. As I've admitted, White men can't jump, but Black men can't do linear algebra.
However, White America suspended its collective disbelief and integration spread from schools to neighborhoods to churches to politics. During that time, White people came up with what I call "guilt programs": welfare and later AFDC, food stamps, HeadStart, Affirmative Action, racial quotas in hiring and education, reduced fees and college tuition for minorities, free or reduced-cost healthcare...you name it, White people have offered these gifts to Blacks, because we "treated them so awfully in the past". Well of course, slavery is a horrible policy. But after it was over, the children of those slaves had the highest standard of living among non-Whites anywhere in the world.
After all that, White people are now expected to get in line for reparations payments for "our" part in slavery. The fact that not a single living person in the U.S. was ever directly affected by or participated in slavery on either side is no deterrent.
In the end, we are the butt of every negative attitude possible among non-Whites. We are despised by them, hated, targeted. The rhetoric of Obama's Black supporters echoes this. In spite of this, the direction of immigration is always a flow of non-Whites into White countries. If we're so awful, so "racist", why do they want to be among us?
But, what will happen when we're no longer "in charge", when our lands are no longer ours, when we are not leaders but subjects? How might things change?
Let's see...Whites have invented pretty much every object, device and system that makes modern life livable. This runs from conveniences like television, telephones, electric lighting, automobiles, aircraft, internal combustion engines, electronics, and computers, to life-sustaining systems that allow six-billion humans to inhabit this planet: mass agriculture (including chemical pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides as well as plant hybridization and improved seed storage), modern medicine including epidemiology, recycling and reduction of waste products and pollutants, and energy-efficient construction and operational techniques. These contributions have allowed most of the 3rd World to survive childhood and have large families. In fact, it has allowed the world's population balance to shift from 34% White in 1900 to between just 8-10% today. We can't know for sure, because many countries don't want to alarm their White residents by posting correct census figures. But we can say with certainty, for instance, that there are more Indians or Chinese or Africans on Earth than all White people combined. We are only a majority in a few places, for now.
And when large non-White families arrive in this land, courtesy of Emmanuel Celler's and Ted Kennedy's 1965 inversion of the immigrant ratios, we generally pay for them in one way or another. That money will be gone.
White Folk need to make hard decisions, and soon. We need to turn a critical eye on our apparent willingness to contribute to our own extinction. Will we expend our talents, our creativity, our work and our time to help others or ourselves? Will we continue to give away our technologies to those who can't properly use them or keep them for our own enrichment and progress? Will we continue to live among people who hate us, or form our own lands and let them fend for themselves without us? These and other choices will be made, either by us or for us.
It's time we worked together to ensure our own future. It's time for us to put ourselves first and let the chips fall where they will. It's time for us to part company with the leeches who are draining our resources, filling our spaces and abusing our Folk. It's time for the restoration of White Nations.
(* Note: many thanks to Mad Casper for his editing!)
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Pushing Back
Last night, I heard yet another politician going on about the "immigration crisis". Whenever I see the word "crisis" in conjunction with either government or media nitwits, the situation becomes clear. It's just another series of events which either or both of those entities have watched and "analyzed", and done absolutely nothing constructive to prevent or correct. In many cases, the actions of the politicos have made everything much worse, or directly caused the "crisis". Examples of these include the ballooning of the mortgage market, the decline of the dollar, and the current disastrous speculation in the petroleum market.
There are some facts to consider when we think about illegal immigration. It's been going on for decades. It was largely enabled by the measured failure of government to do its Constitutional duty and enforce border laws. Once it was known that people wouldn't be stopped upon entry (and even if arrested, would not be jailed, but deported at the border), certain employers began to hire these workers for sub-legal wages and unregulated hours. This began in the agriculture industry, and spread to manual labor, then to unskilled and now, skilled labor. In a time when apprenticeships have become outmoded for citizens as cost-ineffective, illegals have learned new skills and gained experience because they make far less money. This allows sloppier work and looser schedules without dismissal, because even correcting bad work costs less than paying someone to do it right the first time. Simple economics. And as time has gone by, the Western world has learned to accept incompetence, delays, workers who don't speak the local language, and a growing population of those people inside their countries.
In the U.S., there are estimates ranging from 12- to 30-MILLION people within the borders who simply do not belong here. The current mob of invaders are demanding the "right" to transplant their national identities into America completely intact, while expecting Americans to fund their families (over a third of illegals are on welfare and/or food stamps), their kids' educations (many states have laws requiring all children to be educated in public schools, even in their "native languages"), and take care of their health (most American hospitals have to treat anyone who shows up in emergency rooms, even if not for emergencies; this is causing more and more hospitals to shut down every year). There are many sources of unbiased information which were used to dismantle the "What if [illegal] immigrants disappeared" argument that illegals are vitally needed by Americans. We don't need them, they need us. Otherwise, we'd be looking to Mexico, Nicaragua, etc. for life lessons.
The political windbag I was listening to was discussing the patent foolishness of any idea which would remove the illegal population from the U.S. In other words, in his opinion, there's no way we will ever restore America to a nation with actual boundaries which can't be crossed. Can't even be reasonably discussed, said he. I hadn't checked, but he may also be a supporter of the North American Union, which promotes erasing our borders entirely, and replace dollars with "ameros". These would be the same bastards who have been destroying the fabric of Europe, by the same methods.
My response to this is simple. I propose that we leave the professional military in Iraq, as they prepare to wage war against Iran and further float Israel's aggressive dominance in the Middle East on an ocean of young American blood. They are mercenaries at the moment, having been deluded into believing they are defending Americans at home. Yes, they should be here, shoring up the borders, but they are not coming back en masse for many years. I wish them well and hope they survive.
But on the home front, there's a simpler solution: a deputization by popular vote, under authority of the 2nd Amendment.
Citizens currently outnumber the illegal invaders at 10 to 1 or better. In another generation, they will be citizens themselves along with another 20-million who drift across the border to gain amnesty. There is no more time left to us to waste. If we wait, we hasten the creation of the new Mexination of "Aztlan" in our Southwest.
The corollary to this lies at the other end: ridding ourselves of the internal problem children who've gotten us to this point: the arrogant politicians who opened our country to this, the avaricious business owners who paid them to come here, and the controlled media which cheered it all on.
There are some facts to consider when we think about illegal immigration. It's been going on for decades. It was largely enabled by the measured failure of government to do its Constitutional duty and enforce border laws. Once it was known that people wouldn't be stopped upon entry (and even if arrested, would not be jailed, but deported at the border), certain employers began to hire these workers for sub-legal wages and unregulated hours. This began in the agriculture industry, and spread to manual labor, then to unskilled and now, skilled labor. In a time when apprenticeships have become outmoded for citizens as cost-ineffective, illegals have learned new skills and gained experience because they make far less money. This allows sloppier work and looser schedules without dismissal, because even correcting bad work costs less than paying someone to do it right the first time. Simple economics. And as time has gone by, the Western world has learned to accept incompetence, delays, workers who don't speak the local language, and a growing population of those people inside their countries.
In the U.S., there are estimates ranging from 12- to 30-MILLION people within the borders who simply do not belong here. The current mob of invaders are demanding the "right" to transplant their national identities into America completely intact, while expecting Americans to fund their families (over a third of illegals are on welfare and/or food stamps), their kids' educations (many states have laws requiring all children to be educated in public schools, even in their "native languages"), and take care of their health (most American hospitals have to treat anyone who shows up in emergency rooms, even if not for emergencies; this is causing more and more hospitals to shut down every year). There are many sources of unbiased information which were used to dismantle the "What if [illegal] immigrants disappeared" argument that illegals are vitally needed by Americans. We don't need them, they need us. Otherwise, we'd be looking to Mexico, Nicaragua, etc. for life lessons.
The political windbag I was listening to was discussing the patent foolishness of any idea which would remove the illegal population from the U.S. In other words, in his opinion, there's no way we will ever restore America to a nation with actual boundaries which can't be crossed. Can't even be reasonably discussed, said he. I hadn't checked, but he may also be a supporter of the North American Union, which promotes erasing our borders entirely, and replace dollars with "ameros". These would be the same bastards who have been destroying the fabric of Europe, by the same methods.
My response to this is simple. I propose that we leave the professional military in Iraq, as they prepare to wage war against Iran and further float Israel's aggressive dominance in the Middle East on an ocean of young American blood. They are mercenaries at the moment, having been deluded into believing they are defending Americans at home. Yes, they should be here, shoring up the borders, but they are not coming back en masse for many years. I wish them well and hope they survive.
But on the home front, there's a simpler solution: a deputization by popular vote, under authority of the 2nd Amendment.
A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.Make all able-bodied adult citizens Immigration Enforcement Officers. Give them militia-like capacity to arrest, detain, deport and if necessary, to shoot illegals. This is the way our ancestors, from the Founders on, would have handled the problem.
Citizens currently outnumber the illegal invaders at 10 to 1 or better. In another generation, they will be citizens themselves along with another 20-million who drift across the border to gain amnesty. There is no more time left to us to waste. If we wait, we hasten the creation of the new Mexination of "Aztlan" in our Southwest.
The corollary to this lies at the other end: ridding ourselves of the internal problem children who've gotten us to this point: the arrogant politicians who opened our country to this, the avaricious business owners who paid them to come here, and the controlled media which cheered it all on.
Friday, April 18, 2008
Fourth and Goal
Every week during football season, people get together and talk about the weekend game. There is debate about offense and defense, officiating and penalties. Coaching strategies are dissected, and after it's all been rehashed, the next game talked about. We all know this as "Monday morning quarterbacking". It's a semi-humorous method of taking the coach's place. Of course, it has no effect on the previous game or the next one, but millions engage in it anyway. It lets off steam and allows people to identify with a particular sport or team as a fan, because they can't actually play the game on a professional level. Occasionally, we hear of fans being called "hobbyists", because their patronage is simply a diversion from the daily grind of life.
I've recently begun to have this feeling about White Nationalist (WN) forums. If you go to any of these and read the posts, you'll find that someone has THE answer for any problem currently afflicting the White race. In fact, several do. Every incident, under whatever topic, is carefully peeled down, analyzed, regarded with respect to its impact on White people, and then...not much else.
At first glance, it seems a bit strange that, while the New World Order folks have been busy tearing down every civil right possessed by Americans, racialist internet forums have largely been left alone. Yes, there have been attacks by individuals and even small groups of interlopers, but there has been no serious government clamp-down on WN forums. Many have found that hard to believe, but there's method to the apparent oversight. The people in power understand that, even among WNs, the Sheep Factor is still going strong.
In a forum for, say, Corvette enthusiasts, one commonality is, most of the posters actually do things which they then write or ask questions about. For instance, they may install some performance equipment, then a post appears, and others make pro and con comments, offer advice, share their own experience, and so on.
The problem with WN forums is, there is a practical limit on what people there can (and will) do outside the forum. It's called "criminal behavior". And most, therefore, have resigned themselves to writing and ranting.
The reason for this is simple. Right now, White people around the world are facing the most hostile period in the history of our Race. Having won the Second War to Kill White People (WW2), the zio-communists (variously called "leftists", "liberals", "Democrats", and more recently "Republicans") have since spent their time infiltrating Western governments and completely overhauling various policies to ensure that Whites are now on the defensive on all fronts. This has taken the form of various imposed ideologies and other alterations, such as forced racial integration, affirmative action and quotas, feminism, promotion of homosexuality, open borders and defense of CrimMigration, currency debasement, and the erasure of national identities.
What this has done is placed White people in a quandary. Whites are prevented, in many cases under color of law, from rebutting legal and moral assaults against themselves. If a White person harms a non-White, it's almost always classified as a "hate crime", while the reverse is almost never true, even when self-evident. If a White person condemns the policies of Israel or the behavior of individual jews (Asiatic ethnics), the "anti-semitism" flag is raised (although, tellingly, there is no opposite equivalent for jews dumping on White people). Politicians pander to every group except Whites, whom they apparently see as irrelevant. As a group, the system tells White people, in essence, to sit down and shut up.
President John F. Kennedy recognized the danger in suppressing healthy resistance to oppression when he said, "He who makes peaceful revolution impossible, makes violent revolution inevitable." If steam is passed through a series of valves and pipes, a house is warmed. If the steam is contained, the boiler builds pressure and eventually explodes. If White people can't even express their frustrations without being called "racists", "haters" or worse; if White men can't defend their women and families without being hauled into court; if White groups can't gather on their own time and in their own places without intrusion by a dozen other groups, then serious, irreversible problems begin to fester.
The forum postings provide a regulated vent for many people, allowing them to become Keyboard Kommandos and fight against the Man, against ZOG, against the NWO, the jews, the Blacks, the "hispanics" and whomever else the White race is facing. And when they shut off their PCs, they can turn on CSI and life goes on. No harm and no foul, but no change either.
In cold honesty, the only path that's left for Whites as a group is mass violence. It is, as JFK said, inevitable. In every White-majority country, non-White immigration has become a flood. The lifeboats are sinking. Even the most ardently indifferent White person can see it. It gets worse every year. The White populations of those countries are declining, fed by the NWO lie of the "need" for outsiders and the bottom-line greed of deracinated White business owners and their customers.
In the not-too-distant future, some White person will have had enough. That person will react to the world with extreme, deadly force. Another will see it happen and be moved to act, and another, and another. People will throw up their hands and no longer care if they live or die, and in this mind, they will act. And so it will begin.
The pieces of this puzzle are now being laid in place; along with the other aspects, the economies of the Western countries are heading into the toilet. Businesses will cut staff, people will stop buying, families will lose their homes, and formerly apathetic Whites will be forced into direct, daily and dangerous contact with people who hate them with a passion, simply because they are White. At that time, they will understand that their skin is their uniform. Whether there will be enough of them left to right the ship before it sinks beneath the waves forever is another question.
I've recently begun to have this feeling about White Nationalist (WN) forums. If you go to any of these and read the posts, you'll find that someone has THE answer for any problem currently afflicting the White race. In fact, several do. Every incident, under whatever topic, is carefully peeled down, analyzed, regarded with respect to its impact on White people, and then...not much else.
At first glance, it seems a bit strange that, while the New World Order folks have been busy tearing down every civil right possessed by Americans, racialist internet forums have largely been left alone. Yes, there have been attacks by individuals and even small groups of interlopers, but there has been no serious government clamp-down on WN forums. Many have found that hard to believe, but there's method to the apparent oversight. The people in power understand that, even among WNs, the Sheep Factor is still going strong.
In a forum for, say, Corvette enthusiasts, one commonality is, most of the posters actually do things which they then write or ask questions about. For instance, they may install some performance equipment, then a post appears, and others make pro and con comments, offer advice, share their own experience, and so on.
The problem with WN forums is, there is a practical limit on what people there can (and will) do outside the forum. It's called "criminal behavior". And most, therefore, have resigned themselves to writing and ranting.
The reason for this is simple. Right now, White people around the world are facing the most hostile period in the history of our Race. Having won the Second War to Kill White People (WW2), the zio-communists (variously called "leftists", "liberals", "Democrats", and more recently "Republicans") have since spent their time infiltrating Western governments and completely overhauling various policies to ensure that Whites are now on the defensive on all fronts. This has taken the form of various imposed ideologies and other alterations, such as forced racial integration, affirmative action and quotas, feminism, promotion of homosexuality, open borders and defense of CrimMigration, currency debasement, and the erasure of national identities.
What this has done is placed White people in a quandary. Whites are prevented, in many cases under color of law, from rebutting legal and moral assaults against themselves. If a White person harms a non-White, it's almost always classified as a "hate crime", while the reverse is almost never true, even when self-evident. If a White person condemns the policies of Israel or the behavior of individual jews (Asiatic ethnics), the "anti-semitism" flag is raised (although, tellingly, there is no opposite equivalent for jews dumping on White people). Politicians pander to every group except Whites, whom they apparently see as irrelevant. As a group, the system tells White people, in essence, to sit down and shut up.
President John F. Kennedy recognized the danger in suppressing healthy resistance to oppression when he said, "He who makes peaceful revolution impossible, makes violent revolution inevitable." If steam is passed through a series of valves and pipes, a house is warmed. If the steam is contained, the boiler builds pressure and eventually explodes. If White people can't even express their frustrations without being called "racists", "haters" or worse; if White men can't defend their women and families without being hauled into court; if White groups can't gather on their own time and in their own places without intrusion by a dozen other groups, then serious, irreversible problems begin to fester.
The forum postings provide a regulated vent for many people, allowing them to become Keyboard Kommandos and fight against the Man, against ZOG, against the NWO, the jews, the Blacks, the "hispanics" and whomever else the White race is facing. And when they shut off their PCs, they can turn on CSI and life goes on. No harm and no foul, but no change either.
In cold honesty, the only path that's left for Whites as a group is mass violence. It is, as JFK said, inevitable. In every White-majority country, non-White immigration has become a flood. The lifeboats are sinking. Even the most ardently indifferent White person can see it. It gets worse every year. The White populations of those countries are declining, fed by the NWO lie of the "need" for outsiders and the bottom-line greed of deracinated White business owners and their customers.
In the not-too-distant future, some White person will have had enough. That person will react to the world with extreme, deadly force. Another will see it happen and be moved to act, and another, and another. People will throw up their hands and no longer care if they live or die, and in this mind, they will act. And so it will begin.
The pieces of this puzzle are now being laid in place; along with the other aspects, the economies of the Western countries are heading into the toilet. Businesses will cut staff, people will stop buying, families will lose their homes, and formerly apathetic Whites will be forced into direct, daily and dangerous contact with people who hate them with a passion, simply because they are White. At that time, they will understand that their skin is their uniform. Whether there will be enough of them left to right the ship before it sinks beneath the waves forever is another question.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
