Every week during football season, people get together and talk about the weekend game. There is debate about offense and defense, officiating and penalties. Coaching strategies are dissected, and after it's all been rehashed, the next game talked about. We all know this as "Monday morning quarterbacking". It's a semi-humorous method of taking the coach's place. Of course, it has no effect on the previous game or the next one, but millions engage in it anyway. It lets off steam and allows people to identify with a particular sport or team as a fan, because they can't actually play the game on a professional level. Occasionally, we hear of fans being called "hobbyists", because their patronage is simply a diversion from the daily grind of life.
I've recently begun to have this feeling about White Nationalist (WN) forums. If you go to any of these and read the posts, you'll find that someone has THE answer for any problem currently afflicting the White race. In fact, several do. Every incident, under whatever topic, is carefully peeled down, analyzed, regarded with respect to its impact on White people, and then...not much else.
At first glance, it seems a bit strange that, while the New World Order folks have been busy tearing down every civil right possessed by Americans, racialist internet forums have largely been left alone. Yes, there have been attacks by individuals and even small groups of interlopers, but there has been no serious government clamp-down on WN forums. Many have found that hard to believe, but there's method to the apparent oversight. The people in power understand that, even among WNs, the Sheep Factor is still going strong.
In a forum for, say, Corvette enthusiasts, one commonality is, most of the posters actually do things which they then write or ask questions about. For instance, they may install some performance equipment, then a post appears, and others make pro and con comments, offer advice, share their own experience, and so on.
The problem with WN forums is, there is a practical limit on what people there can (and will) do outside the forum. It's called "criminal behavior". And most, therefore, have resigned themselves to writing and ranting.
The reason for this is simple. Right now, White people around the world are facing the most hostile period in the history of our Race. Having won the Second War to Kill White People (WW2), the zio-communists (variously called "leftists", "liberals", "Democrats", and more recently "Republicans") have since spent their time infiltrating Western governments and completely overhauling various policies to ensure that Whites are now on the defensive on all fronts. This has taken the form of various imposed ideologies and other alterations, such as forced racial integration, affirmative action and quotas, feminism, promotion of homosexuality, open borders and defense of CrimMigration, currency debasement, and the erasure of national identities.
What this has done is placed White people in a quandary. Whites are prevented, in many cases under color of law, from rebutting legal and moral assaults against themselves. If a White person harms a non-White, it's almost always classified as a "hate crime", while the reverse is almost never true, even when self-evident. If a White person condemns the policies of Israel or the behavior of individual jews (Asiatic ethnics), the "anti-semitism" flag is raised (although, tellingly, there is no opposite equivalent for jews dumping on White people). Politicians pander to every group except Whites, whom they apparently see as irrelevant. As a group, the system tells White people, in essence, to sit down and shut up.
President John F. Kennedy recognized the danger in suppressing healthy resistance to oppression when he said, "He who makes peaceful revolution impossible, makes violent revolution inevitable." If steam is passed through a series of valves and pipes, a house is warmed. If the steam is contained, the boiler builds pressure and eventually explodes. If White people can't even express their frustrations without being called "racists", "haters" or worse; if White men can't defend their women and families without being hauled into court; if White groups can't gather on their own time and in their own places without intrusion by a dozen other groups, then serious, irreversible problems begin to fester.
The forum postings provide a regulated vent for many people, allowing them to become Keyboard Kommandos and fight against the Man, against ZOG, against the NWO, the jews, the Blacks, the "hispanics" and whomever else the White race is facing. And when they shut off their PCs, they can turn on CSI and life goes on. No harm and no foul, but no change either.
In cold honesty, the only path that's left for Whites as a group is mass violence. It is, as JFK said, inevitable. In every White-majority country, non-White immigration has become a flood. The lifeboats are sinking. Even the most ardently indifferent White person can see it. It gets worse every year. The White populations of those countries are declining, fed by the NWO lie of the "need" for outsiders and the bottom-line greed of deracinated White business owners and their customers.
In the not-too-distant future, some White person will have had enough. That person will react to the world with extreme, deadly force. Another will see it happen and be moved to act, and another, and another. People will throw up their hands and no longer care if they live or die, and in this mind, they will act. And so it will begin.
The pieces of this puzzle are now being laid in place; along with the other aspects, the economies of the Western countries are heading into the toilet. Businesses will cut staff, people will stop buying, families will lose their homes, and formerly apathetic Whites will be forced into direct, daily and dangerous contact with people who hate them with a passion, simply because they are White. At that time, they will understand that their skin is their uniform. Whether there will be enough of them left to right the ship before it sinks beneath the waves forever is another question.
Friday, April 18, 2008
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Meximum Exposure
The "Absolut Disaster" ad (above) has been commented about and circulated all day. As might be expected when caught with their corporate hand in the New World Order cookie jar, the company's been blathering about their real intent, lack of intent, or confused intent. Confused by...us? Confused by the White People of North America and their, what, surprising (?) reaction to this image?
As of this moment, Mexicans have illegally entered this country for over 30 years. Illegally from our perspective, that is. There are 30-million here that should not be, by law. Another 3-million were given a pass by "our" Congress in 1986, and they're all now looking for the Round 2 amnesty to pass sometime soon, which they have precisely no entitlement to. After all, our government beat them in a war, signed treaties with them (which bear a higher authority than Congressional law), paid them $28-million for what we took, and so our laws apply. Thus, they and their kids have zero right to be on this side of the line.
Apart from the many, many criminal, paramilitary street gangs and criminal organizations which have arrived north of the Rio Grande, there are two groups which we should know about and understand. They are Mexican nationalist orgs, which I would actually support if Mexico didn't already exist as the Mexican homeland. The problem I have with them is, they are attempting to precipitate the division of the United States at the expense of the White majority, and unless something radically and rapidly changes, they will win their lost land back.
They call their expanded version of Mexico "Aztlán", an adapted Nahuatl tribal word, although some refer to much of it as "Alta [Upper] California". They see the green image on that map as "theirs", and will not debate that point. They are called "MEChA" (Acronym for "Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán") and an offshoot, "La Raza" ("The Race"). MEChA wants you to hand over the green states, no compromise. And please do not think that the folks in that group will hand out any "benefits" to us or our families. They don't think we deserve it, and have said so. It's the attitude you notice most when people are waving Mexican flags, burning effigies of Uncle Sam, and holding signs calling the Founding Fathers "illegal immigrants". However, no Mexican has yet provided proof of claim on Virginia, nor could they physically displace the dot.Indians and Blacks.
Whites are no longer the majority population in New Mexico and California, and will soon be below 50% in Texas and Arizona. Other states across the country are feeling the resettlements, including Iowa, Tennessee and Pennsylvania. Most East Coast states are already beyond repair: NJ, NY, Rhode Island, Massachusetts are largely "not us".
With the tattered condition that the U.S. is in, with most of its troops fighthing Bush's and McCain's 100-year war, and many of those troops being "hispanic", many thinking White people have come to a conclusion. To toss our chips into the pile with a government which despises us, distorts our history and heritage, puts those less qualified ahead of us, and yokes us to supporting illegals, invaders and layabouts who prefer other pastimes to working, is perhaps not the best idea. This government can't save things, can't protect anyone and can't stop what a certain element started perhaps 50 years ago. We must sit out this larger pending war with the mestizos, and concentrate our efforts to gain a North American White Homeland. If the Mexicans, at 15% of the population, can pull this off, so can Whites at four times their numbers. Or can we?
One way in which this can be accomplished is the way that White Americans traditionally avoided racial conflicts and accompanying street crime: "voting with our feet". By making one last move to a new location, by migration. A land where we can live by ourselves, and not impose ourselves on others who hate us. Those people can have us out of their lives forever. And of course, the reverse is also true. Perhaps it could be the Pacific Northwest (Northwest Republic), perhaps the northern tier States (Republic of Dakota), or maybe upper New England (2nd Vermont Republic, Vinland Nation, or Acadia). Other areas would be, sadly, less than optimal.
There is a limited, narrowing window on such a plan. If it doesn't start soon, very soon, it will likely not be possible ever again.
The alternative aspect to this is now flooding across our former countries like a tsunami. "Our" bought and owned politicians have thrown the floodgates open, and in a final push are working to ensure that, no matter who's elected in November, things will not change. Whites will become the minority population in this country, and our percentage will decline every year. When White partners are no longer available for our descendant to mate with, the plan of the Nation Wreckers will be complete. For a glimpse of a hispanic-majority scenario, refer to the history of Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, or Mexico. For a Black/White study, either Jamaica, South Africa or Zimbabwe will do. None of those is very appealing.
As the numbers increase, the tax liabilities expand, and the economy finally sputters to a halt in a sea of foreign debt and political extravagances, things will get much worse. If we are still here, distributed across post-crash AmeriKwa, we will be forced to fight while disorganized and often disarmed, and the odds are not in our favor.
We will need to make any choice for a Homeland, today, this week, this year. As the old saying goes, better to have and not need, than need and not have.
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Interlock
The biggest obstacles to the achievement of any group goal are lack of leadership, and missing unity of purpose. It's been said that only 1 in 20 people is a true leader, and of those, few are willing to accept the mantle of leadership and all the headaches and heartaches it entails. Without a leader or leaders, working in a common, positive direction, others in the group are in disarray. Gen. Omar Bradley, commander of U.S. Army forces at the end of the Second War to Kill White People (WW2), once said absence of leadership is like pushing the end of a string. The string bunches up, gets tangled, and goes nowhere. However, when you take hold and pull it, lead it, it follows wherever it needs to go.
Leaders need to possess certain characteristics: Focus, belief in their abilities, drive, knowledge of how to use the system to their advantage, understanding of the "big picture" as well as tactics, charisma, intelligence, and an unwillingness to compromise their position. True leaders must also be willing to stand at the head of their operation, to be the first to take a bullet, to do jail time, or to receive mass criticism. They must also accept responsibility for personal losses and defeats.
Unity is simply the focused, singular coherence of any group of people. It can occur at many levels, from team sports to company sales drives to international warfare. By definition, it requires a removal of divisions. If part of an army is off picking daisies while the rest are firing weapons at the enemy, that army will lose. If one part of a group denigrates another part, that group becomes dysfunctional and any direction it had is lost to in-fighting. Any unity achieved is also lost.
For many years, White Nationalism has been plagued by problems in both these areas.
Since the mid-1950's, we have had many intelligent proponents of White Unity, writers such as Oswald Spengler, William Simpson, Revilo Oliver and others. But in that same period, we've had very few true leaders. And among those leaders, there has been precious little consensus on direction, political involvement, strategic and tactical plans, recruitment and mainstream "presentation". Instead, these men have created many self-declared fiefdoms and petty organizations, and spent much valuable time criticizing their perceived opponents. These ad hominem attacks are, frankly, not only horrifically counter-productive, but beneath us as a People. And unlike previous White leaders, whether for better or worse, no recent "leader" has had the fortitude to actually put his words into practice. The possible exception to this was Cdr. George Lincoln Rockwell, and he is almost 40 years in the past now.
The Minutemen and other Colonial rebels were certainly aware that their actions were considered treason and carried a penalty of death by hanging. The men who led them were even more deeply in danger; charges against them included sedition and directing military insurrection against the Crown. Yet, they also knew that nothing would be accomplished without irreversibly crossing certain lines. So, with determination they picked up their rifles, and went to war to give birth to their new nation. Many died, many were jailed and dispossessed, but they did what they felt they had to do.
How many "leaders" in the White Nationalist movement would do such things now? How many would leave their keyboards and go into the streets? How many possess organizational skills? How many can drum up a large following who would die with them for their cause? How many are willing, as were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, to pledge their Lives, their Fortunes and their sacred Honor? How many will we tell our grandchildren about?
Within the White race, unity is a scarce commodity. We have been lulled by television, the SUV in the driveway, Super Sunday, the latest episode of CSI, and other diversions. We have lost our attachment to our lands, our histories, our heritage, and most importantly, our racial family. We listen little to our kin and less to our Elders. As a group, we spent hundreds of years fighting among ourselves in petty wars ordered by overindulged royalty: Irish against English, German against Pole, Russian against Czech, Swede against Finn, Spaniard against Catalan. We focused almost entirely on our differences. Unfortunately, we still do.
Just yesterday, I read a post on a WN forum asking whether Russians should be considered "White". There are entire threads on many of these fora asking the question, "Who is White?". There are others comparing the relative "Whiteness" of Italians vs. Germans, or Portuguese vs. Norwegians. Even among White people, as with Blacks and the "high yellow" stereotype, there is some sort of White hierarchy.
Are we kidding? This is what's important to the continuation of "us"?
As I've said until I'm hoarse, we can't afford such tomfoolery. The Europeans of the world are just 8.5% of all the people alive. That's it. Ethnic squabbles are flies on the elephant's back. We have bigger fish to fry. In the oft-quoted, but rarely-lived words of David Lane, "We must secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children." That's it, folks. That's the bottom line. How can we secure ANYTHING if we can't even agree to do ANYTHING together? If we're badgering, belittling or degrading our own? If we're too zoned-out on TelAvivision to see? If we allow the alien Wreckers of our People to teach our kids, make our laws, create our societies and plan our futures for us?
We need Leaders. True, honest, honorable, purposeful, selfless, courageous Leaders with a capital "L". Leaders who understand that personal aggrandizement and financial gain are not the hallmarks of leadership, but of prostitution. Leaders who've learned from the past but don't dwell there. Leaders who would truly take a bullet for those behind them. Leaders who will stand up to the power structure, organize a following, and make the changes that must be made, or die trying.
And we need patriots who will back them. Men and Women of our Folk who are loyal to the needs of our People, fixated on the endgame, understand that it's now or never, and agree that, in the words of John Hancock, "Yes, we must indeed all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."
Leaders need to possess certain characteristics: Focus, belief in their abilities, drive, knowledge of how to use the system to their advantage, understanding of the "big picture" as well as tactics, charisma, intelligence, and an unwillingness to compromise their position. True leaders must also be willing to stand at the head of their operation, to be the first to take a bullet, to do jail time, or to receive mass criticism. They must also accept responsibility for personal losses and defeats.
Unity is simply the focused, singular coherence of any group of people. It can occur at many levels, from team sports to company sales drives to international warfare. By definition, it requires a removal of divisions. If part of an army is off picking daisies while the rest are firing weapons at the enemy, that army will lose. If one part of a group denigrates another part, that group becomes dysfunctional and any direction it had is lost to in-fighting. Any unity achieved is also lost.
For many years, White Nationalism has been plagued by problems in both these areas.
Since the mid-1950's, we have had many intelligent proponents of White Unity, writers such as Oswald Spengler, William Simpson, Revilo Oliver and others. But in that same period, we've had very few true leaders. And among those leaders, there has been precious little consensus on direction, political involvement, strategic and tactical plans, recruitment and mainstream "presentation". Instead, these men have created many self-declared fiefdoms and petty organizations, and spent much valuable time criticizing their perceived opponents. These ad hominem attacks are, frankly, not only horrifically counter-productive, but beneath us as a People. And unlike previous White leaders, whether for better or worse, no recent "leader" has had the fortitude to actually put his words into practice. The possible exception to this was Cdr. George Lincoln Rockwell, and he is almost 40 years in the past now.
The Minutemen and other Colonial rebels were certainly aware that their actions were considered treason and carried a penalty of death by hanging. The men who led them were even more deeply in danger; charges against them included sedition and directing military insurrection against the Crown. Yet, they also knew that nothing would be accomplished without irreversibly crossing certain lines. So, with determination they picked up their rifles, and went to war to give birth to their new nation. Many died, many were jailed and dispossessed, but they did what they felt they had to do.
How many "leaders" in the White Nationalist movement would do such things now? How many would leave their keyboards and go into the streets? How many possess organizational skills? How many can drum up a large following who would die with them for their cause? How many are willing, as were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, to pledge their Lives, their Fortunes and their sacred Honor? How many will we tell our grandchildren about?
Within the White race, unity is a scarce commodity. We have been lulled by television, the SUV in the driveway, Super Sunday, the latest episode of CSI, and other diversions. We have lost our attachment to our lands, our histories, our heritage, and most importantly, our racial family. We listen little to our kin and less to our Elders. As a group, we spent hundreds of years fighting among ourselves in petty wars ordered by overindulged royalty: Irish against English, German against Pole, Russian against Czech, Swede against Finn, Spaniard against Catalan. We focused almost entirely on our differences. Unfortunately, we still do.
Just yesterday, I read a post on a WN forum asking whether Russians should be considered "White". There are entire threads on many of these fora asking the question, "Who is White?". There are others comparing the relative "Whiteness" of Italians vs. Germans, or Portuguese vs. Norwegians. Even among White people, as with Blacks and the "high yellow" stereotype, there is some sort of White hierarchy.
Are we kidding? This is what's important to the continuation of "us"?
As I've said until I'm hoarse, we can't afford such tomfoolery. The Europeans of the world are just 8.5% of all the people alive. That's it. Ethnic squabbles are flies on the elephant's back. We have bigger fish to fry. In the oft-quoted, but rarely-lived words of David Lane, "We must secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children." That's it, folks. That's the bottom line. How can we secure ANYTHING if we can't even agree to do ANYTHING together? If we're badgering, belittling or degrading our own? If we're too zoned-out on TelAvivision to see? If we allow the alien Wreckers of our People to teach our kids, make our laws, create our societies and plan our futures for us?
We need Leaders. True, honest, honorable, purposeful, selfless, courageous Leaders with a capital "L". Leaders who understand that personal aggrandizement and financial gain are not the hallmarks of leadership, but of prostitution. Leaders who've learned from the past but don't dwell there. Leaders who would truly take a bullet for those behind them. Leaders who will stand up to the power structure, organize a following, and make the changes that must be made, or die trying.
And we need patriots who will back them. Men and Women of our Folk who are loyal to the needs of our People, fixated on the endgame, understand that it's now or never, and agree that, in the words of John Hancock, "Yes, we must indeed all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."
Friday, March 28, 2008
Standing In The Corner
Over the past few weeks, I've been reading a series of novels by Harold A. Covington. Mr. Covington has been a soldier, most notably participating with the S.A.S. in the Rhodesia wars of 30 years ago, before Ian Smith's horrendous betrayal of Rhodesians.
The books are about the establishment of a Northwestern American Republic, comprising the current states of Washington, Oregon and Idaho. It's an idea which I wholeheartedly favor. The titles of these works are:
"A Mighty Fortress"
"A Distant Thunder"
"The Hill of the Ravens"
"The Brigade" (newly released in PDF)
Mr. Covington is not the only person to preach the idea of a White homeland in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Several years ago, a man named Robert Mathews formed a group called "The Order" and was joined by several other men. Mathews believed that the PNW was the ideal place for White nationhood to happen. He also knew that the movement would need money, and so the group committed criminal acts to get that money. This led to their downfall, with Mathews being burned to death in his home, at the hand of Federal agents.
Since then, less provocative measures have been taken in order to spread the word of White migration to the PNW. There have been a succession of organizations and websites dedicated to that end.
In the books, without giving too much of the plot away, one day agents of the U.S. government go over the line once too many, and the formerly somnolent sheeple awaken with a start and find their feet. What proceeds from that moment is the core of the story. It's not simple, it's not pretty, there are many setbacks, losses and hardships. But the people in the tale achieve their ultimate goal.
We are in a place in time where events are gathering which can produce extraordinary devastation of part or all of our population. Coupled with this is the increasing downward pressure on European Folk across the globe. Even Europe's future is no longer certain. Former comedian, and now grumpy old bastard, George Carlin thinks the time of White people in Europe is over, and the next phase of that continent is muslim. Assuming that's true, and with Canada and Australia being flooded with Asians, and the U.S. with "hispanics" (and Asians as well), where would Mr. Carlin suppose White people will live? HOW does he suppose we'll continue? How will life be in lands where we're a 1/10th minority, or less? Will our new governors be as disposed to putting their hand out for us as the foolish among us have done for them?
The PNW core states of Oregon, Washington and Idaho contain 245,336 square miles of land area. There are just over 10,000,000 people living in the three states, but the bulk of the population, about 35%, lives in the major cities. Even so, this averages just 41 people per square mile. Compare that with the rat-trap of New Jersey at 1150/sq. mi.
I lived in western Oregon for almost two years, almost two decades ago. I will always remember it as a magnificent area, full of every blessing which could be bestowed on a land. There were places I'd see on the backroads, where I'd simply have to stop and drink in the scenery and smell the clean air of the forested mountains. I spent free time travelling, from northern California up through Puget Sound, and into B.C. I often took a lunch, travelled out for miles on some unused fire road in the hills, and sat reading and eating while watching the natural world around me. Even my house had a view of a small mountainside, and an old train would sometimes wind its way along the edge of that mountain early in the day. Had my personal circumstances been different at that time, I'd never have left.
There are miles of mountains, forests, grasslands and farms in the PNW. It has ports and accessibility to the Pacific markets. Environmental controls are strict but small businesses are encouraged. Its economy is slow at the moment, but with a strong population of like mind and industriousness, concentrating on bringing out the best aspects of the area, it could be a powerhouse. It could also be a beacon to White people everywhere who are tired of current events and how they'll inevitably play out. At that point, perhaps other states might desire inclusion.
We have allowed the lands our ancestors created and built to take in residents, many illegally here, who now push us from among themselves. Whites who have "voted with their feet" on the concept of integrated living now find themselves with few places left to which to flee. Yet, staying and fighting for our space in most of the U.S. is no longer viable, since those who take a stand will be deemed "terrorists" by the New World Order faction.
If we do build a White nation, we will have no one to rely on but ourselves. We would be in conflict with many already in the PNW: those of the Left, those from wealthier backgrounds whose lives revolve around the bottom line, and those who live off the teat of government. And we would be, as the Confederacy found itself, illegally denied our Right to secede and to live on our own terms, by force. Any such migration favoring to that conclusion must include preparation for conflicts on its menu.
There is precious little time left for White people to decide on a course of action, here or anywhere else. This is not alarmism nor is it an extremist, tin-foil hat declaration. We are at the edge. Many will not become involved in politics, will not resist, will not stand, will not adhere to our own and unify. They will die off. If we follow their lead, so shall we all pass and be gone forever.
Every day, we see people taking a stand for different reasons and within various causes: Darfur, Tibet, the end of the war in Iraq, and so on. In some cases, people gather to prevent certain species from disappearing: whales, spotted owls, tigers, wolves or snail darter fish. These animals, they feel, merit special help because they are being pressured out of existence.
Are White people any less deserving of survival? Are the people who gave "the World" to the world less important? Are the originators of Western Civilization so trivially discarded?
We must stand as one, we must now put aside our ethnic and historical differences, and we must have a singular purpose: to secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children. Without achieving that, there can be nothing else for us.
The books are about the establishment of a Northwestern American Republic, comprising the current states of Washington, Oregon and Idaho. It's an idea which I wholeheartedly favor. The titles of these works are:
"A Distant Thunder"
"The Hill of the Ravens"
"The Brigade" (newly released in PDF)
Mr. Covington is not the only person to preach the idea of a White homeland in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Several years ago, a man named Robert Mathews formed a group called "The Order" and was joined by several other men. Mathews believed that the PNW was the ideal place for White nationhood to happen. He also knew that the movement would need money, and so the group committed criminal acts to get that money. This led to their downfall, with Mathews being burned to death in his home, at the hand of Federal agents.
Since then, less provocative measures have been taken in order to spread the word of White migration to the PNW. There have been a succession of organizations and websites dedicated to that end.
In the books, without giving too much of the plot away, one day agents of the U.S. government go over the line once too many, and the formerly somnolent sheeple awaken with a start and find their feet. What proceeds from that moment is the core of the story. It's not simple, it's not pretty, there are many setbacks, losses and hardships. But the people in the tale achieve their ultimate goal.
We are in a place in time where events are gathering which can produce extraordinary devastation of part or all of our population. Coupled with this is the increasing downward pressure on European Folk across the globe. Even Europe's future is no longer certain. Former comedian, and now grumpy old bastard, George Carlin thinks the time of White people in Europe is over, and the next phase of that continent is muslim. Assuming that's true, and with Canada and Australia being flooded with Asians, and the U.S. with "hispanics" (and Asians as well), where would Mr. Carlin suppose White people will live? HOW does he suppose we'll continue? How will life be in lands where we're a 1/10th minority, or less? Will our new governors be as disposed to putting their hand out for us as the foolish among us have done for them?
The PNW core states of Oregon, Washington and Idaho contain 245,336 square miles of land area. There are just over 10,000,000 people living in the three states, but the bulk of the population, about 35%, lives in the major cities. Even so, this averages just 41 people per square mile. Compare that with the rat-trap of New Jersey at 1150/sq. mi.
I lived in western Oregon for almost two years, almost two decades ago. I will always remember it as a magnificent area, full of every blessing which could be bestowed on a land. There were places I'd see on the backroads, where I'd simply have to stop and drink in the scenery and smell the clean air of the forested mountains. I spent free time travelling, from northern California up through Puget Sound, and into B.C. I often took a lunch, travelled out for miles on some unused fire road in the hills, and sat reading and eating while watching the natural world around me. Even my house had a view of a small mountainside, and an old train would sometimes wind its way along the edge of that mountain early in the day. Had my personal circumstances been different at that time, I'd never have left.
There are miles of mountains, forests, grasslands and farms in the PNW. It has ports and accessibility to the Pacific markets. Environmental controls are strict but small businesses are encouraged. Its economy is slow at the moment, but with a strong population of like mind and industriousness, concentrating on bringing out the best aspects of the area, it could be a powerhouse. It could also be a beacon to White people everywhere who are tired of current events and how they'll inevitably play out. At that point, perhaps other states might desire inclusion.
We have allowed the lands our ancestors created and built to take in residents, many illegally here, who now push us from among themselves. Whites who have "voted with their feet" on the concept of integrated living now find themselves with few places left to which to flee. Yet, staying and fighting for our space in most of the U.S. is no longer viable, since those who take a stand will be deemed "terrorists" by the New World Order faction.
If we do build a White nation, we will have no one to rely on but ourselves. We would be in conflict with many already in the PNW: those of the Left, those from wealthier backgrounds whose lives revolve around the bottom line, and those who live off the teat of government. And we would be, as the Confederacy found itself, illegally denied our Right to secede and to live on our own terms, by force. Any such migration favoring to that conclusion must include preparation for conflicts on its menu.
There is precious little time left for White people to decide on a course of action, here or anywhere else. This is not alarmism nor is it an extremist, tin-foil hat declaration. We are at the edge. Many will not become involved in politics, will not resist, will not stand, will not adhere to our own and unify. They will die off. If we follow their lead, so shall we all pass and be gone forever.
Every day, we see people taking a stand for different reasons and within various causes: Darfur, Tibet, the end of the war in Iraq, and so on. In some cases, people gather to prevent certain species from disappearing: whales, spotted owls, tigers, wolves or snail darter fish. These animals, they feel, merit special help because they are being pressured out of existence.
Are White people any less deserving of survival? Are the people who gave "the World" to the world less important? Are the originators of Western Civilization so trivially discarded?
We must stand as one, we must now put aside our ethnic and historical differences, and we must have a singular purpose: to secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children. Without achieving that, there can be nothing else for us.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
All Downhill, And No Brakes
As things move along in the criminal diamond we call Washington, DC (in utter contempt of one of our finest leaders), the thought has come to me, more than once, that the whole progression of events can not avoid ending in incredibly violent bloodshed.
Today's latest outrage originated in a suspect Supreme Court [sic] decision involving the handgun ban in their hometown. All cities in the United States have, in the past, respected one's Right to own, and openly carry, both hand and long guns. Most people did not feel the need to so carry early in our history, particularly after the War of Independence. After all, they'd just spent eleven years proving that they were on good terms with one another. All those who'd not been had either emigrated to Canada or Great Britain, or been left swinging at the end of a rope in the public square. Nonetheless, they could own any weapon of their choosing.
Particularly since the 1950s, certain groups of people in this land have been pushing through a plan, an agenda, to systematically and incrementally reduce, and then remove, our natural Rights. Their presentation initially avoided confrontation with the majority. But over time, they began a full-frontal assault on the liberties of that majority. In all areas of daily life, their policies began to infect and destroy us.
Initially, our Founders tried to coalesce a guidebook for political freedom. And from the beginning, the greed and lust for power of some men tore pieces from our Constitution. The Founders saw the truest seats of power in the States themselves. Their localized governments depended on upward support from the cities, towns and farmlands. Tyrannical behavior is difficult to undertake when you're watched by a vigilant citizenry. And for that reason, to take advantage of distance, those in the District of Columbia began to usurp the powers of the States and the People in them.
If you even briefly read the Constitution, you will notice one overriding characteristic: All of the powers of the President, the Congress and the Courts are grants by the States. In fact, the language of Amendment X makes that completely clear:
Since 1787, we have had expansions in every area of assigned and unassigned Federal government power. We have also seen prohibitions, restrictions and controls placed on every Right we have.
"Rights" are considered arbitrary by relativists. There are "civil rights", "gay rights", and "animal rights". In fact, these are of recent vintage. The original Right we have thought ourselves proper to possess is, the Right to be Left Alone. Or, "let alone", in the beautiful dialects of the South. And yet, throughout the past 60 years, more and more people, under the anonymous mask of "government", have contrived to NEVER leave us alone.
We can't say what's truthfully on our minds, thanks to "political correctness", a Trotskyite phrase from our friends in the old Soviet Union. We can't appear to oppose Obama's minister's statements, or we're "narrow-minded" and "racist". Christians among us are not allowed to post Christmas symbols on public property, but a Hannukah menorah can burn on the White House lawn. Pagans among us are not "recognized" by the U.S. Army, of all things, as being in a "true religion". We can't buy property on a handshake nor live off the land no matter how rural; if the U.S. had had property taxes early on, no one would have settled the frontier. And of the taxes extorted from us, backed up with paramilitary force, we have no say in their ultimate expenditure. You assets can be taken and kept by Uncle Scam during pre-trial proceedings, and not returned even after proof of your innocence. The list of personal infractions is never-ending.
And more importantly, we have been denied our right to Assemble...if we're White. We have been somehow disallowed our Right to plan for our own survival. We are prohibited from excluding others, whether in our organizations, our businesses, or our neighborhoods. Our group Rights are becoming more fragile everyday.
So in the Supreme Court's mind, and as eagerly and breathlessly editorialized upon by the news rags, TV talking heads and online post-whores disguised as "journalists", there MAY be a "Constitutionally based" restriction on handgun ownership placed upon ALL AmeriKwans, not just those inside the Beltway. No doubt the constant, clear and present physical danger posed by the non-working, mouth-upon-teat local detritus to the Guys in Suits may have something to do with their desire to further increment divestiture of firearms. But for the rest of the country, the Supremes may have just stepped over their benchmarks and cracked open the can that finally shakes the electorate awake.
We are seeing a dying power clamping down viciously in its throes. They are beginning to see that their policies are tearing down the country and exposing them to real dangers. The FED desperately enacts plans to bail out the rich, mostly jewish, and secondarily WASPy-brahmin financial community, with all involved making profits on the ups and downs they know in advance, as always. In the financial stratosphere we've allowed them to create, they never get the raw end. We do.
They are building detention centers, removing citizen weaponry, taking control of oil resources, water resources and farmland. They are, through their inflationary policies, robbing us every year of everything we've worked for, then converting it into gold before everyone else jumps on. They tie us to contracts and protect predatory lenders. They keep our borders open and allow the invasion of our land. They give our jobs to the less-qualified, our college seats to the less-intelligent, our jobs to the less-skilled, and finally our country to the less-deserving.
And now we are facing a Crash that may make the Great Depression seem like a walk in the park. There are predictions of 45% unemployment. Fewer workers equals less tax money, equals fewer government benefits. Then the wheels really come off.
We are near the precipice. When the f*ck will our People WAKE UP?
Today's latest outrage originated in a suspect Supreme Court [sic] decision involving the handgun ban in their hometown. All cities in the United States have, in the past, respected one's Right to own, and openly carry, both hand and long guns. Most people did not feel the need to so carry early in our history, particularly after the War of Independence. After all, they'd just spent eleven years proving that they were on good terms with one another. All those who'd not been had either emigrated to Canada or Great Britain, or been left swinging at the end of a rope in the public square. Nonetheless, they could own any weapon of their choosing.
Particularly since the 1950s, certain groups of people in this land have been pushing through a plan, an agenda, to systematically and incrementally reduce, and then remove, our natural Rights. Their presentation initially avoided confrontation with the majority. But over time, they began a full-frontal assault on the liberties of that majority. In all areas of daily life, their policies began to infect and destroy us.
Initially, our Founders tried to coalesce a guidebook for political freedom. And from the beginning, the greed and lust for power of some men tore pieces from our Constitution. The Founders saw the truest seats of power in the States themselves. Their localized governments depended on upward support from the cities, towns and farmlands. Tyrannical behavior is difficult to undertake when you're watched by a vigilant citizenry. And for that reason, to take advantage of distance, those in the District of Columbia began to usurp the powers of the States and the People in them.
If you even briefly read the Constitution, you will notice one overriding characteristic: All of the powers of the President, the Congress and the Courts are grants by the States. In fact, the language of Amendment X makes that completely clear:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.There's the word, "delegated". Servants do not delegate to masters. As nowhere else, these words enunciate our absolute dominance over the District of Clowns.
Since 1787, we have had expansions in every area of assigned and unassigned Federal government power. We have also seen prohibitions, restrictions and controls placed on every Right we have.
"Rights" are considered arbitrary by relativists. There are "civil rights", "gay rights", and "animal rights". In fact, these are of recent vintage. The original Right we have thought ourselves proper to possess is, the Right to be Left Alone. Or, "let alone", in the beautiful dialects of the South. And yet, throughout the past 60 years, more and more people, under the anonymous mask of "government", have contrived to NEVER leave us alone.
We can't say what's truthfully on our minds, thanks to "political correctness", a Trotskyite phrase from our friends in the old Soviet Union. We can't appear to oppose Obama's minister's statements, or we're "narrow-minded" and "racist". Christians among us are not allowed to post Christmas symbols on public property, but a Hannukah menorah can burn on the White House lawn. Pagans among us are not "recognized" by the U.S. Army, of all things, as being in a "true religion". We can't buy property on a handshake nor live off the land no matter how rural; if the U.S. had had property taxes early on, no one would have settled the frontier. And of the taxes extorted from us, backed up with paramilitary force, we have no say in their ultimate expenditure. You assets can be taken and kept by Uncle Scam during pre-trial proceedings, and not returned even after proof of your innocence. The list of personal infractions is never-ending.
And more importantly, we have been denied our right to Assemble...if we're White. We have been somehow disallowed our Right to plan for our own survival. We are prohibited from excluding others, whether in our organizations, our businesses, or our neighborhoods. Our group Rights are becoming more fragile everyday.
So in the Supreme Court's mind, and as eagerly and breathlessly editorialized upon by the news rags, TV talking heads and online post-whores disguised as "journalists", there MAY be a "Constitutionally based" restriction on handgun ownership placed upon ALL AmeriKwans, not just those inside the Beltway. No doubt the constant, clear and present physical danger posed by the non-working, mouth-upon-teat local detritus to the Guys in Suits may have something to do with their desire to further increment divestiture of firearms. But for the rest of the country, the Supremes may have just stepped over their benchmarks and cracked open the can that finally shakes the electorate awake.
We are seeing a dying power clamping down viciously in its throes. They are beginning to see that their policies are tearing down the country and exposing them to real dangers. The FED desperately enacts plans to bail out the rich, mostly jewish, and secondarily WASPy-brahmin financial community, with all involved making profits on the ups and downs they know in advance, as always. In the financial stratosphere we've allowed them to create, they never get the raw end. We do.
They are building detention centers, removing citizen weaponry, taking control of oil resources, water resources and farmland. They are, through their inflationary policies, robbing us every year of everything we've worked for, then converting it into gold before everyone else jumps on. They tie us to contracts and protect predatory lenders. They keep our borders open and allow the invasion of our land. They give our jobs to the less-qualified, our college seats to the less-intelligent, our jobs to the less-skilled, and finally our country to the less-deserving.
And now we are facing a Crash that may make the Great Depression seem like a walk in the park. There are predictions of 45% unemployment. Fewer workers equals less tax money, equals fewer government benefits. Then the wheels really come off.
We are near the precipice. When the f*ck will our People WAKE UP?
Friday, February 29, 2008
Nightmare
I've always been one of those people who never remembers their dreams. I sleep like a rock and sometimes snore like a bear, but the little movies that run through my mind don't seep into my conscious thoughts upon waking. Last night was different.
The dream I had was chilling because it played out within completely normal life circumstances. It was also fearsome because it's actually happening right now, slowly, inexorably and, unless we completely change course, permanently.
It was a weekend or holiday, because it was mid-day and I wasn't working. I was out taking a relaxed walk on the street near my apartment, enjoying the sunshine. But something was very wrong. I couldn't put a finger on it. Then it hit me. There were almost no people on the street. The thought came over me that I needed to get off the street, to hide somewhere out of view.
I ran behind a small building near the local canal, squatting low among the adjacent shrubbery which was beginning to show new Spring growth. As I looked out, a truck rolled by, filled with National Guardsmen followed by another slightly smaller truck with cops in the bed. The second truck was towing a trailer. All the men were wearing riot gear and fully armed. There were also cops hanging on the sides of the cab, looking down the streets.
They approached the house across from me, stopped, and several ran up to the front door. A cop with gray hair knocked on the door, and an older woman answered. She was asked to step outside, and as she did, she was taken by the arm to a school bus and put aboard. Next, an old man came to the door, the cop said something to him, and he was also taken away. A small group of men went inside, and came back out with a shotgun, some papers and a cardboard box. I heard the senior military officer say to the old man, "You are charged with violation of the Weapons Act."
I took a back route back to my apartment, and when I got there, I knew I had to get my things and get away from there. There were two young people in the parking lot loading their car with bags. I turned on the TV and there were news reports of mass "anti-terrorism" arrests, including searches and arrests for possession of firearms in the New York metro area following "FBI infiltration of a White supremacist organization with ties to al-Qaeda". The news said the Feds had a huge list of people who were involved and were finding them, and taking them to six Federal detention centers. All of the people being arrested on the video were White.
Neither of the news anchors were White. None of the cops or Guardsmen I'd seen in the trucks were White. I put together a bag with my most valuable possessions. I loaded that into my car along with my toolbox and guns, and drove out of my complex. None of the people I passed on the street were White; almost all were Latino and Indian. On the radio, there was a report that a small nuclear bomb had been found in lower Manhattan, and a second in Union City, NJ. Scientists were attempting to disarm them. Rumors of neo-Nazi involvement was interspersed. Roads across northern New Jersey were jammed, said the radio. My knuckles were white from gripping the wheel.
I veered off onto a side road and knew I was going to need a different vehicle to get out of the area. I parked my car in a lot, quickly removed the license plates and pried off the VIN plate. There was an Indian couple nearby, sitting in their Hummer H3. I made an instant decision. I walked over, pulled out my pistol and commandeered the truck. My first thought was to get as far north as possible, and to take as many off-road routes as possible. I was shaking from the adrenaline rush, trying to avoid authorities, trying to figure out the right way to go, and saw distant flashing lights in my rearview mirror. I woke up bathed in sweat.
I took a long shower, then sat on my couch, thinking about the dream. Completely coincidentally, I saw an advertisement in an open "Wired" magazine talking about the expanding world population. We will have, said the ad, 70 million more people added to the world's population EVERY YEAR. And I thought about the projection that the total world population will be NINE BILLION in another 30 years. Of that increase, almost ALL of will be non-White.
The floodgates of White nations of the world have been opened to uncontrolled Third World immigration. White people aren't pouring into China, India, Africa, Indonesia or Mexico. But the reverse, as we all know, is certainly true. China could send out a contingent equal to the total population of the U.S. and STILL have over a BILLION people at home. Ditto India.
We are merely eight percent (8%) of the entire human population. Until recently, we were largely unaffected by the fact of our dwindling numbers, because we lived within land areas comprised almost entirely of our own kindred. While this was in effect, our numbers relative to the rest of the planet were inconsequential. We largely ignored the outside world.
The problem, the 800-lb. gorilla in the living room, the point that no reporter or politician or even White activist can or will express, is simple. The goal of the powers in charge, the zionists, the New World Order, the far Left, the internationalists, is to equalize the White population ratio in EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH. They want every country to contain no more than 8% White people. Once that's achieved, we will be further isolated, divided, reduced, worn away, and absorbed by the non-White masses until we are gone. Period.
This is the reason behind "hate crime" and "hate speech" laws which are ONLY directed at Whites. This is the reason behind the lumping of Latino and other non-Whites into the "White" perpetrator category in DOJ crime statistics, but not in the victim category. This is the reason for the celebration of Black majority takeover in South Africa, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Congo and Kenya, while at the same time decrying White majority opinion in Europe. It's the reason for the increasing torrent of portrayals of interracial relationships on TV and in films. It's why the strict immigration policies of the nations of Mexico, China, India and Israel are lauded, but any attempt to restrain immigration of non-Whites into Europe is condemned. It's why, according to the media, White history is filled with racists and genocidal maniacs, while Black history translates into an entire month of celebration. It's why Mexicans who have no legal right to be in the U.S. can hold mass demonstrations against the country they've invaded, while White Americans are considered criminals and smeared if they gather to promote their own cause.
We are having everything we've achieved stripped from us, every law we've created to protect our Rights torn away, and every land in which we live swarmed over. While this is going on, the White middle-class wordlessly worries and frets and does absolutely nothing to change it.
Soon enough, I think, my nightmare will begin to play out. Whites will become targets, simply because they are White. This has already happened in Africa and South America. It will also begin to happen in North America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and wherever else we exist in numbers. It will accelerate. It will be fueled by the media. The power elites, the traitors to their own People, will isolate themselves, and the rest of us will pay the cost through our total destruction.
I am not going quietly into that long night, my Friends. The time to act is already upon us. The machinery for our destruction has been put into operation. What will you do? Will you stand and live, or lie down and die?
The dream I had was chilling because it played out within completely normal life circumstances. It was also fearsome because it's actually happening right now, slowly, inexorably and, unless we completely change course, permanently.
It was a weekend or holiday, because it was mid-day and I wasn't working. I was out taking a relaxed walk on the street near my apartment, enjoying the sunshine. But something was very wrong. I couldn't put a finger on it. Then it hit me. There were almost no people on the street. The thought came over me that I needed to get off the street, to hide somewhere out of view.
I ran behind a small building near the local canal, squatting low among the adjacent shrubbery which was beginning to show new Spring growth. As I looked out, a truck rolled by, filled with National Guardsmen followed by another slightly smaller truck with cops in the bed. The second truck was towing a trailer. All the men were wearing riot gear and fully armed. There were also cops hanging on the sides of the cab, looking down the streets.
They approached the house across from me, stopped, and several ran up to the front door. A cop with gray hair knocked on the door, and an older woman answered. She was asked to step outside, and as she did, she was taken by the arm to a school bus and put aboard. Next, an old man came to the door, the cop said something to him, and he was also taken away. A small group of men went inside, and came back out with a shotgun, some papers and a cardboard box. I heard the senior military officer say to the old man, "You are charged with violation of the Weapons Act."
I took a back route back to my apartment, and when I got there, I knew I had to get my things and get away from there. There were two young people in the parking lot loading their car with bags. I turned on the TV and there were news reports of mass "anti-terrorism" arrests, including searches and arrests for possession of firearms in the New York metro area following "FBI infiltration of a White supremacist organization with ties to al-Qaeda". The news said the Feds had a huge list of people who were involved and were finding them, and taking them to six Federal detention centers. All of the people being arrested on the video were White.
Neither of the news anchors were White. None of the cops or Guardsmen I'd seen in the trucks were White. I put together a bag with my most valuable possessions. I loaded that into my car along with my toolbox and guns, and drove out of my complex. None of the people I passed on the street were White; almost all were Latino and Indian. On the radio, there was a report that a small nuclear bomb had been found in lower Manhattan, and a second in Union City, NJ. Scientists were attempting to disarm them. Rumors of neo-Nazi involvement was interspersed. Roads across northern New Jersey were jammed, said the radio. My knuckles were white from gripping the wheel.
I veered off onto a side road and knew I was going to need a different vehicle to get out of the area. I parked my car in a lot, quickly removed the license plates and pried off the VIN plate. There was an Indian couple nearby, sitting in their Hummer H3. I made an instant decision. I walked over, pulled out my pistol and commandeered the truck. My first thought was to get as far north as possible, and to take as many off-road routes as possible. I was shaking from the adrenaline rush, trying to avoid authorities, trying to figure out the right way to go, and saw distant flashing lights in my rearview mirror. I woke up bathed in sweat.
I took a long shower, then sat on my couch, thinking about the dream. Completely coincidentally, I saw an advertisement in an open "Wired" magazine talking about the expanding world population. We will have, said the ad, 70 million more people added to the world's population EVERY YEAR. And I thought about the projection that the total world population will be NINE BILLION in another 30 years. Of that increase, almost ALL of will be non-White.
The floodgates of White nations of the world have been opened to uncontrolled Third World immigration. White people aren't pouring into China, India, Africa, Indonesia or Mexico. But the reverse, as we all know, is certainly true. China could send out a contingent equal to the total population of the U.S. and STILL have over a BILLION people at home. Ditto India.
We are merely eight percent (8%) of the entire human population. Until recently, we were largely unaffected by the fact of our dwindling numbers, because we lived within land areas comprised almost entirely of our own kindred. While this was in effect, our numbers relative to the rest of the planet were inconsequential. We largely ignored the outside world.
The problem, the 800-lb. gorilla in the living room, the point that no reporter or politician or even White activist can or will express, is simple. The goal of the powers in charge, the zionists, the New World Order, the far Left, the internationalists, is to equalize the White population ratio in EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH. They want every country to contain no more than 8% White people. Once that's achieved, we will be further isolated, divided, reduced, worn away, and absorbed by the non-White masses until we are gone. Period.
This is the reason behind "hate crime" and "hate speech" laws which are ONLY directed at Whites. This is the reason behind the lumping of Latino and other non-Whites into the "White" perpetrator category in DOJ crime statistics, but not in the victim category. This is the reason for the celebration of Black majority takeover in South Africa, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Congo and Kenya, while at the same time decrying White majority opinion in Europe. It's the reason for the increasing torrent of portrayals of interracial relationships on TV and in films. It's why the strict immigration policies of the nations of Mexico, China, India and Israel are lauded, but any attempt to restrain immigration of non-Whites into Europe is condemned. It's why, according to the media, White history is filled with racists and genocidal maniacs, while Black history translates into an entire month of celebration. It's why Mexicans who have no legal right to be in the U.S. can hold mass demonstrations against the country they've invaded, while White Americans are considered criminals and smeared if they gather to promote their own cause.
We are having everything we've achieved stripped from us, every law we've created to protect our Rights torn away, and every land in which we live swarmed over. While this is going on, the White middle-class wordlessly worries and frets and does absolutely nothing to change it.
Soon enough, I think, my nightmare will begin to play out. Whites will become targets, simply because they are White. This has already happened in Africa and South America. It will also begin to happen in North America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and wherever else we exist in numbers. It will accelerate. It will be fueled by the media. The power elites, the traitors to their own People, will isolate themselves, and the rest of us will pay the cost through our total destruction.
I am not going quietly into that long night, my Friends. The time to act is already upon us. The machinery for our destruction has been put into operation. What will you do? Will you stand and live, or lie down and die?
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Twenty Miles From Afar And Closing
In the past few days, I've read a lot about the front-running Presidential candidates. I number those at 3: Hillary Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama and John McCain.
Sen. Hillary Clinton: a checkered past involving S&L collapses, money laundering and possible assorted "hits" (Vince Foster, et al), the Senator "from" New York, is now lagging in polling. Maybe Americans have had enough of the Bush and Clinton families. Supports naturalization of CrimMigrants, including those, mostly Asian, who've violated H1-B visas. Accepts large donations from AIPAC (America-Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel PAC) and has spoken at their national meetings. She has lost much of her appeal at the polls, perhaps in part due to her crying incident, but who knows why? She will, I believe, be out of the running unless the media sells her harder.
Sen. Barack Obama: half-Black African, half-White. Currently supports most of the same things Clinton does. Wants to allow women to make their own decisions about partial-birth abortion. That would allow abortion at the point where we're dealing with viable human beings, and murder. He would "confront" China on our massive debt, on which they're holding most of the paper (if China calls in our debt, we go bankrupt, period). He wants something called "class-based" affirmative action, not just the race-based kind (although he insists he's for "equal rights" while supporting race-preferential programs). In other words, he wants everyone to have the same amount of income.
There are two ways to do that. You can "bring up" the lower income brackets (which are disproportionately non-White), and this idea has been trotted out in a dozen different suits, from Head Start to "No Child Left Behind". No possibility of success. Or, you can bring the upper echelons down. This can be done primarily through preferential or punitive taxation. Certain industries not in line with the President's policies get hammered, others, perhaps owned by certain individuals, get a boost. And of course, all the (disproportionately White) neo-Yuppies in their McMansions get crushed, in plummeting real estate prices, escalating property tax and personal credit costs, rising utility and toll costs, and so on.
Sen. John Sidney McCain: called "Insane McCain" by more than a few. McCain was by all accounts a pilot who stayed on course right into anti-aircraft fire. He was captured, with broken arms, and subjected to years of confinement and apparent torture. There are many veterans organizations which oppose McCain's candidacy, which seemed a strange thing until one reads the negative accounts of several of his co-captives. Be that as it may, it's witness testimony from potentially hostile witnesses and thus not a reason for me to be deterred.
What does deter me is McCain's history of serious waffling, his affiliations with Democrats on bad legislation, and his support of the continuation of the War Without End in Iraq. Soon, we should say under a McCain administration, to include Iran? Yes, it will. Then we can square off with the Russians over their primary source of foreign oil becoming an American domain.
John McCain changes his mind about important issues more often than a "vid-iot" changes cable channels. For a good look at his political bipolar disorder, check YouTube.
McCain has also sponsored legislation to limit free political speech (McCain-Feingold), and has worked with Ted Kennedy on three versions of an Amnesty bill to benefit the 20-30 Million CrimMigrants. If the government included them in their public publications, the population would officially be 330 Million, of which 45 Million would be "legal" hispanics*, and 30 Million more would be the illegal invaders. That places the physical hispanic percentage of the population at almost 23% right now. It also readjusts even the generous FedGov allocation of 65% White populace to 59% overall (we know that most Asians and almost all Blacks are legal citizens, so their numbers remain the same).
In 1964-65, a lying Ted Kennedy told America that reversing the immigration ratio from 90% European, 10% other nations, would not change the demographic makeup of the country. All three current mainstream candidates support naturalization of 20-30 million people, an unearned reward to those who broke the law coming here, with the support of "your" government and business community. All three of them support continued involvement in the undeclared War.
One candidate doesn't support any of this bullshit. However, the time for that candidacy is passing. So, a note on the Ron Paul candidacy.
Dr. Paul is the choice of many people of all political backgrounds. His pro-Constitution position, which should be the norm for anyone who considers his (or her) self competent to be the leader of the United States of America, endears him to freedom-loving voters.
However, Dr. Paul's personal priority is not in winning this particular election. He has stated, and continues to, that he will not, under any circumstances, run as an independent, or third-party, candidate. He will not leave the Republican party, so he can continue to run for Congress in his Texas home district. This means, to me, that Dr. Paul would prefer to retire from service to our country as a humble, and well-liked, Representative. Certainly, Dr. Paul has earned this, and at 72 years of age may have no desire to end his campaign as a thoroughly beaten candidate in the final contest in November. He lags behind the media-fueled mainstream contenders, and is a victim of the American fool's mentality of believing in backing a "winner".
Because Ron Paul will not win the Republican nomination, because not enough voters will write him in on the Republican ticket, because he will not abandon the Republicans, and because he's a realist, Ron Paul is already finished.
But there IS something we can ask Dr. Paul to do. We can ask that he nominate his successor in the fight, a younger Constitutionalist who is not tied to the G.O.P., and can run on a third-party ticket. Maybe someone in their 40's, with a good deal of life experience but plenty of energy left. If this generation's greatest champion of the magnificent legacy of our Founders, and beloved elder statesman, put his imprimatur on someone, we'd know that person had the country's best interests in mind.
So, at this point, I would urge the good doctor to pass the torch. It would give the country time to get behind the new bearer of those true, Constitutionally-correct ideas and practices. That person could carry on the battle of Order over Chaos, and confront the pretenders to the Oval Office on both issues and conduct.
Maybe, just maybe, we could save the country for those who follow us, and make politics a more honest, forthright, benevolent and selfless endeavor. OK, one out of two is fine.
Note: "Hispanic" is a weasel-word of the Feds which avoids classifying Mexican tribesmen or mestizos (mixed Asiatic (AmerInd)-European blood) as a separate racial group, even though every American of any race understands that they are. Instead, they are "placed" in one or another group. Therefore, a pure Mexican national can call himself "White" although he has no European ancestry. This concept was preceded by a similar inclusion of Arabs, jews and gypsies in the Census Bureau's "White" classification criteria. It's also a good reason why Whites are not called "European-Americans" anywhere in official literature; to do so would admit that near-Eastern Asiatics are not "White" by definition.
Sen. Hillary Clinton: a checkered past involving S&L collapses, money laundering and possible assorted "hits" (Vince Foster, et al), the Senator "from" New York, is now lagging in polling. Maybe Americans have had enough of the Bush and Clinton families. Supports naturalization of CrimMigrants, including those, mostly Asian, who've violated H1-B visas. Accepts large donations from AIPAC (America-Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel PAC) and has spoken at their national meetings. She has lost much of her appeal at the polls, perhaps in part due to her crying incident, but who knows why? She will, I believe, be out of the running unless the media sells her harder.
Sen. Barack Obama: half-Black African, half-White. Currently supports most of the same things Clinton does. Wants to allow women to make their own decisions about partial-birth abortion. That would allow abortion at the point where we're dealing with viable human beings, and murder. He would "confront" China on our massive debt, on which they're holding most of the paper (if China calls in our debt, we go bankrupt, period). He wants something called "class-based" affirmative action, not just the race-based kind (although he insists he's for "equal rights" while supporting race-preferential programs). In other words, he wants everyone to have the same amount of income.
There are two ways to do that. You can "bring up" the lower income brackets (which are disproportionately non-White), and this idea has been trotted out in a dozen different suits, from Head Start to "No Child Left Behind". No possibility of success. Or, you can bring the upper echelons down. This can be done primarily through preferential or punitive taxation. Certain industries not in line with the President's policies get hammered, others, perhaps owned by certain individuals, get a boost. And of course, all the (disproportionately White) neo-Yuppies in their McMansions get crushed, in plummeting real estate prices, escalating property tax and personal credit costs, rising utility and toll costs, and so on.
Sen. John Sidney McCain: called "Insane McCain" by more than a few. McCain was by all accounts a pilot who stayed on course right into anti-aircraft fire. He was captured, with broken arms, and subjected to years of confinement and apparent torture. There are many veterans organizations which oppose McCain's candidacy, which seemed a strange thing until one reads the negative accounts of several of his co-captives. Be that as it may, it's witness testimony from potentially hostile witnesses and thus not a reason for me to be deterred.
What does deter me is McCain's history of serious waffling, his affiliations with Democrats on bad legislation, and his support of the continuation of the War Without End in Iraq. Soon, we should say under a McCain administration, to include Iran? Yes, it will. Then we can square off with the Russians over their primary source of foreign oil becoming an American domain.
John McCain changes his mind about important issues more often than a "vid-iot" changes cable channels. For a good look at his political bipolar disorder, check YouTube.
McCain has also sponsored legislation to limit free political speech (McCain-Feingold), and has worked with Ted Kennedy on three versions of an Amnesty bill to benefit the 20-30 Million CrimMigrants. If the government included them in their public publications, the population would officially be 330 Million, of which 45 Million would be "legal" hispanics*, and 30 Million more would be the illegal invaders. That places the physical hispanic percentage of the population at almost 23% right now. It also readjusts even the generous FedGov allocation of 65% White populace to 59% overall (we know that most Asians and almost all Blacks are legal citizens, so their numbers remain the same).
In 1964-65, a lying Ted Kennedy told America that reversing the immigration ratio from 90% European, 10% other nations, would not change the demographic makeup of the country. All three current mainstream candidates support naturalization of 20-30 million people, an unearned reward to those who broke the law coming here, with the support of "your" government and business community. All three of them support continued involvement in the undeclared War.
One candidate doesn't support any of this bullshit. However, the time for that candidacy is passing. So, a note on the Ron Paul candidacy.
Dr. Paul is the choice of many people of all political backgrounds. His pro-Constitution position, which should be the norm for anyone who considers his (or her) self competent to be the leader of the United States of America, endears him to freedom-loving voters.
However, Dr. Paul's personal priority is not in winning this particular election. He has stated, and continues to, that he will not, under any circumstances, run as an independent, or third-party, candidate. He will not leave the Republican party, so he can continue to run for Congress in his Texas home district. This means, to me, that Dr. Paul would prefer to retire from service to our country as a humble, and well-liked, Representative. Certainly, Dr. Paul has earned this, and at 72 years of age may have no desire to end his campaign as a thoroughly beaten candidate in the final contest in November. He lags behind the media-fueled mainstream contenders, and is a victim of the American fool's mentality of believing in backing a "winner".
Because Ron Paul will not win the Republican nomination, because not enough voters will write him in on the Republican ticket, because he will not abandon the Republicans, and because he's a realist, Ron Paul is already finished.
But there IS something we can ask Dr. Paul to do. We can ask that he nominate his successor in the fight, a younger Constitutionalist who is not tied to the G.O.P., and can run on a third-party ticket. Maybe someone in their 40's, with a good deal of life experience but plenty of energy left. If this generation's greatest champion of the magnificent legacy of our Founders, and beloved elder statesman, put his imprimatur on someone, we'd know that person had the country's best interests in mind.
So, at this point, I would urge the good doctor to pass the torch. It would give the country time to get behind the new bearer of those true, Constitutionally-correct ideas and practices. That person could carry on the battle of Order over Chaos, and confront the pretenders to the Oval Office on both issues and conduct.
Maybe, just maybe, we could save the country for those who follow us, and make politics a more honest, forthright, benevolent and selfless endeavor. OK, one out of two is fine.
Note: "Hispanic" is a weasel-word of the Feds which avoids classifying Mexican tribesmen or mestizos (mixed Asiatic (AmerInd)-European blood) as a separate racial group, even though every American of any race understands that they are. Instead, they are "placed" in one or another group. Therefore, a pure Mexican national can call himself "White" although he has no European ancestry. This concept was preceded by a similar inclusion of Arabs, jews and gypsies in the Census Bureau's "White" classification criteria. It's also a good reason why Whites are not called "European-Americans" anywhere in official literature; to do so would admit that near-Eastern Asiatics are not "White" by definition.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
