Fourth and Goal

Every week during football season, people get together and talk about the weekend game. There is debate about offense and defense, officiating and penalties. Coaching strategies are dissected, and after it's all been rehashed, the next game talked about. We all know this as "Monday morning quarterbacking". It's a semi-humorous method of taking the coach's place. Of course, it has no effect on the previous game or the next one, but millions engage in it anyway. It lets off steam and allows people to identify with a particular sport or team as a fan, because they can't actually play the game on a professional level. Occasionally, we hear of fans being called "hobbyists", because their patronage is simply a diversion from the daily grind of life.

I've recently begun to have this feeling about White Nationalist (WN) forums. If you go to any of these and read the posts, you'll find that someone has THE answer for any problem currently afflicting the White race. In fact, several do. Every incident, under whatever topic, is carefully peeled down, analyzed, regarded with respect to its impact on White people, and then...not much else.

At first glance, it seems a bit strange that, while the New World Order folks have been busy tearing down every civil right possessed by Americans, racialist internet forums have largely been left alone. Yes, there have been attacks by individuals and even small groups of interlopers, but there has been no serious government clamp-down on WN forums. Many have found that hard to believe, but there's method to the apparent oversight. The people in power understand that, even among WNs, the Sheep Factor is still going strong.

In a forum for, say, Corvette enthusiasts, one commonality is, most of the posters actually do things which they then write or ask questions about. For instance, they may install some performance equipment, then a post appears, and others make pro and con comments, offer advice, share their own experience, and so on.

The problem with WN forums is, there is a practical limit on what people there can (and will) do outside the forum. It's called "criminal behavior". And most, therefore, have resigned themselves to writing and ranting.

The reason for this is simple. Right now, White people around the world are facing the most hostile period in the history of our Race. Having won the Second War to Kill White People (WW2), the zio-communists (variously called "leftists", "liberals", "Democrats", and more recently "Republicans") have since spent their time infiltrating Western governments and completely overhauling various policies to ensure that Whites are now on the defensive on all fronts. This has taken the form of various imposed ideologies and other alterations, such as forced racial integration, affirmative action and quotas, feminism, promotion of homosexuality, open borders and defense of CrimMigration, currency debasement, and the erasure of national identities.

What this has done is placed White people in a quandary. Whites are prevented, in many cases under color of law, from rebutting legal and moral assaults against themselves. If a White person harms a non-White, it's almost always classified as a "hate crime", while the reverse is almost never true, even when self-evident. If a White person condemns the policies of Israel or the behavior of individual jews (Asiatic ethnics), the "anti-semitism" flag is raised (although, tellingly, there is no opposite equivalent for jews dumping on White people). Politicians pander to every group except Whites, whom they apparently see as irrelevant. As a group, the system tells White people, in essence, to sit down and shut up.

President John F. Kennedy recognized the danger in suppressing healthy resistance to oppression when he said, "He who makes peaceful revolution impossible, makes violent revolution inevitable." If steam is passed through a series of valves and pipes, a house is warmed. If the steam is contained, the boiler builds pressure and eventually explodes. If White people can't even express their frustrations without being called "racists", "haters" or worse; if White men can't defend their women and families without being hauled into court; if White groups can't gather on their own time and in their own places without intrusion by a dozen other groups, then serious, irreversible problems begin to fester.

The forum postings provide a regulated vent for many people, allowing them to become Keyboard Kommandos and fight against the Man, against ZOG, against the NWO, the jews, the Blacks, the "hispanics" and whomever else the White race is facing. And when they shut off their PCs, they can turn on CSI and life goes on. No harm and no foul, but no change either.

In cold honesty, the only path that's left for Whites as a group is mass violence. It is, as JFK said, inevitable. In every White-majority country, non-White immigration has become a flood. The lifeboats are sinking. Even the most ardently indifferent White person can see it. It gets worse every year. The White populations of those countries are declining, fed by the NWO lie of the "need" for outsiders and the bottom-line greed of deracinated White business owners and their customers.

In the not-too-distant future, some White person will have had enough. That person will react to the world with extreme, deadly force. Another will see it happen and be moved to act, and another, and another. People will throw up their hands and no longer care if they live or die, and in this mind, they will act. And so it will begin.

The pieces of this puzzle are now being laid in place; along with the other aspects, the economies of the Western countries are heading into the toilet. Businesses will cut staff, people will stop buying, families will lose their homes, and formerly apathetic Whites will be forced into direct, daily and dangerous contact with people who hate them with a passion, simply because they are White. At that time, they will understand that their skin is their uniform. Whether there will be enough of them left to right the ship before it sinks beneath the waves forever is another question.

Meximum Exposure

The "Absolut Disaster" ad (above) has been commented about and circulated all day. As might be expected when caught with their corporate hand in the New World Order cookie jar, the company's been blathering about their real intent, lack of intent, or confused intent. Confused by...us? Confused by the White People of North America and their, what, surprising (?) reaction to this image?

As of this moment, Mexicans have illegally entered this country for over 30 years. Illegally from our perspective, that is. There are 30-million here that should not be, by law. Another 3-million were given a pass by "our" Congress in 1986, and they're all now looking for the Round 2 amnesty to pass sometime soon, which they have precisely no entitlement to. After all, our government beat them in a war, signed treaties with them (which bear a higher authority than Congressional law), paid them $28-million for what we took, and so our laws apply. Thus, they and their kids have zero right to be on this side of the line.

Apart from the many, many criminal, paramilitary street gangs and criminal organizations which have arrived north of the Rio Grande, there are two groups which we should know about and understand. They are Mexican nationalist orgs, which I would actually support if Mexico didn't already exist as the Mexican homeland. The problem I have with them is, they are attempting to precipitate the division of the United States at the expense of the White majority, and unless something radically and rapidly changes, they will win their lost land back.

They call their expanded version of Mexico "Aztlán", an adapted Nahuatl tribal word, although some refer to much of it as "Alta [Upper] California". They see the green image on that map as "theirs", and will not debate that point. They are called "MEChA" (Acronym for "Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán") and an offshoot, "La Raza" ("The Race"). MEChA wants you to hand over the green states, no compromise. And please do not think that the folks in that group will hand out any "benefits" to us or our families. They don't think we deserve it, and have said so. It's the attitude you notice most when people are waving Mexican flags, burning effigies of Uncle Sam, and holding signs calling the Founding Fathers "illegal immigrants". However, no Mexican has yet provided proof of claim on Virginia, nor could they physically displace the dot.Indians and Blacks.

Whites are no longer the majority population in New Mexico and California, and will soon be below 50% in Texas and Arizona. Other states across the country are feeling the resettlements, including Iowa, Tennessee and Pennsylvania. Most East Coast states are already beyond repair: NJ, NY, Rhode Island, Massachusetts are largely "not us".

With the tattered condition that the U.S. is in, with most of its troops fighthing Bush's and McCain's 100-year war, and many of those troops being "hispanic", many thinking White people have come to a conclusion. To toss our chips into the pile with a government which despises us, distorts our history and heritage, puts those less qualified ahead of us, and yokes us to supporting illegals, invaders and layabouts who prefer other pastimes to working, is perhaps not the best idea. This government can't save things, can't protect anyone and can't stop what a certain element started perhaps 50 years ago. We must sit out this larger pending war with the mestizos, and concentrate our efforts to gain a North American White Homeland. If the Mexicans, at 15% of the population, can pull this off, so can Whites at four times their numbers. Or can we?

One way in which this can be accomplished is the way that White Americans traditionally avoided racial conflicts and accompanying street crime: "voting with our feet". By making one last move to a new location, by migration. A land where we can live by ourselves, and not impose ourselves on others who hate us. Those people can have us out of their lives forever. And of course, the reverse is also true. Perhaps it could be the Pacific Northwest (Northwest Republic), perhaps the northern tier States (Republic of Dakota), or maybe upper New England (2nd Vermont Republic, Vinland Nation, or Acadia). Other areas would be, sadly, less than optimal.

There is a limited, narrowing window on such a plan. If it doesn't start soon, very soon, it will likely not be possible ever again.

The alternative aspect to this is now flooding across our former countries like a tsunami. "Our" bought and owned politicians have thrown the floodgates open, and in a final push are working to ensure that, no matter who's elected in November, things will not change. Whites will become the minority population in this country, and our percentage will decline every year. When White partners are no longer available for our descendant to mate with, the plan of the Nation Wreckers will be complete. For a glimpse of a hispanic-majority scenario, refer to the history of Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, or Mexico. For a Black/White study, either Jamaica, South Africa or Zimbabwe will do. None of those is very appealing.

As the numbers increase, the tax liabilities expand, and the economy finally sputters to a halt in a sea of foreign debt and political extravagances, things will get much worse. If we are still here, distributed across post-crash AmeriKwa, we will be forced to fight while disorganized and often disarmed, and the odds are not in our favor.

We will need to make any choice for a Homeland, today, this week, this year. As the old saying goes, better to have and not need, than need and not have.

Interlock

The biggest obstacles to the achievement of any group goal are lack of leadership, and missing unity of purpose. It's been said that only 1 in 20 people is a true leader, and of those, few are willing to accept the mantle of leadership and all the headaches and heartaches it entails. Without a leader or leaders, working in a common, positive direction, others in the group are in disarray. Gen. Omar Bradley, commander of U.S. Army forces at the end of the Second War to Kill White People (WW2), once said absence of leadership is like pushing the end of a string. The string bunches up, gets tangled, and goes nowhere. However, when you take hold and pull it, lead it, it follows wherever it needs to go.

Leaders need to possess certain characteristics: Focus, belief in their abilities, drive, knowledge of how to use the system to their advantage, understanding of the "big picture" as well as tactics, charisma, intelligence, and an unwillingness to compromise their position. True leaders must also be willing to stand at the head of their operation, to be the first to take a bullet, to do jail time, or to receive mass criticism. They must also accept responsibility for personal losses and defeats.

Unity is simply the focused, singular coherence of any group of people. It can occur at many levels, from team sports to company sales drives to international warfare. By definition, it requires a removal of divisions. If part of an army is off picking daisies while the rest are firing weapons at the enemy, that army will lose. If one part of a group denigrates another part, that group becomes dysfunctional and any direction it had is lost to in-fighting. Any unity achieved is also lost.

For many years, White Nationalism has been plagued by problems in both these areas.

Since the mid-1950's, we have had many intelligent proponents of White Unity, writers such as Oswald Spengler, William Simpson, Revilo Oliver and others. But in that same period, we've had very few true leaders. And among those leaders, there has been precious little consensus on direction, political involvement, strategic and tactical plans, recruitment and mainstream "presentation". Instead, these men have created many self-declared fiefdoms and petty organizations, and spent much valuable time criticizing their perceived opponents. These ad hominem attacks are, frankly, not only horrifically counter-productive, but beneath us as a People. And unlike previous White leaders, whether for better or worse, no recent "leader" has had the fortitude to actually put his words into practice. The possible exception to this was Cdr. George Lincoln Rockwell, and he is almost 40 years in the past now.

The Minutemen and other Colonial rebels were certainly aware that their actions were considered treason and carried a penalty of death by hanging. The men who led them were even more deeply in danger; charges against them included sedition and directing military insurrection against the Crown. Yet, they also knew that nothing would be accomplished without irreversibly crossing certain lines. So, with determination they picked up their rifles, and went to war to give birth to their new nation. Many died, many were jailed and dispossessed, but they did what they felt they had to do.

How many "leaders" in the White Nationalist movement would do such things now? How many would leave their keyboards and go into the streets? How many possess organizational skills? How many can drum up a large following who would die with them for their cause? How many are willing, as were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, to pledge their Lives, their Fortunes and their sacred Honor? How many will we tell our grandchildren about?

Within the White race, unity is a scarce commodity. We have been lulled by television, the SUV in the driveway, Super Sunday, the latest episode of CSI, and other diversions. We have lost our attachment to our lands, our histories, our heritage, and most importantly, our racial family. We listen little to our kin and less to our Elders. As a group, we spent hundreds of years fighting among ourselves in petty wars ordered by overindulged royalty: Irish against English, German against Pole, Russian against Czech, Swede against Finn, Spaniard against Catalan. We focused almost entirely on our differences. Unfortunately, we still do.

Just yesterday, I read a post on a WN forum asking whether Russians should be considered "White". There are entire threads on many of these fora asking the question, "Who is White?". There are others comparing the relative "Whiteness" of Italians vs. Germans, or Portuguese vs. Norwegians. Even among White people, as with Blacks and the "high yellow" stereotype, there is some sort of White hierarchy.

Are we kidding? This is what's important to the continuation of "us"?

As I've said until I'm hoarse, we can't afford such tomfoolery. The Europeans of the world are just 8.5% of all the people alive. That's it. Ethnic squabbles are flies on the elephant's back. We have bigger fish to fry. In the oft-quoted, but rarely-lived words of David Lane, "We must secure the existence of our People, and a future for White children." That's it, folks. That's the bottom line. How can we secure ANYTHING if we can't even agree to do ANYTHING together? If we're badgering, belittling or degrading our own? If we're too zoned-out on TelAvivision to see? If we allow the alien Wreckers of our People to teach our kids, make our laws, create our societies and plan our futures for us?

We need Leaders. True, honest, honorable, purposeful, selfless, courageous Leaders with a capital "L". Leaders who understand that personal aggrandizement and financial gain are not the hallmarks of leadership, but of prostitution. Leaders who've learned from the past but don't dwell there. Leaders who would truly take a bullet for those behind them. Leaders who will stand up to the power structure, organize a following, and make the changes that must be made, or die trying.

And we need patriots who will back them. Men and Women of our Folk who are loyal to the needs of our People, fixated on the endgame, understand that it's now or never, and agree that, in the words of John Hancock, "Yes, we must indeed all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."